Terence Tan Li-Chern

Terence Tan Li-Chern is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misrepresentation. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Terence Tan Li-Chern has demonstrated expertise across 34 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and fraud and deceit.

Practice AreaCase Volume
Criminal Law2 cases
Fraud and Deceit2 cases
Statutory Interpretation2 cases
Contract Law2 cases
Misrepresentation1 cases
Family Assets Distribution1 cases
Evidence Law1 cases
Undue Influence1 cases
Non est factum1 cases
Sentencing1 cases
Misuse of Drugs Act1 cases
Criminal Procedure1 cases
Property Disputes1 cases
Estoppel1 cases
Agency Law1 cases
Sexual Offences1 cases
Wills Act1 cases
Commercial Sex1 cases
Succession Law1 cases
Gifts1 cases
Matrimonial Assets Division1 cases
Equity1 cases
Trusts — Constructive trusts1 cases
Trusts — Express trusts1 cases
Estate Law1 cases
Women’s Charter1 cases
Intention of Parties1 cases
Deed of Family Arrangement1 cases
Family Trusts1 cases
Probate1 cases
Law of Wills1 cases
Family Law1 cases
Property Law1 cases
Torts1 cases

Law Firm Affiliations

Terence Tan Li-Chern has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Terence Tan Li-Chern's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
3.2
Complex Cases
2 (50%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Lost32.7 parties avg
Won14.0 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
201423.3 parties avg
201914.0 parties avg
202112.0 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Terence Tan Li-Chern's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Lost3(75%)
Won1(25%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
SGD40,000.001 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20142
11
20191
1
20211
1

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

Case
22 Aug 2021
Poh Chiak Ow (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost
20 Jan 2019
Roszaidi bin Osman (Defendant)Lost
02 Oct 2014
Leu Xing-Long (Appellant)Lost
09 Jan 2014
Goh Meich’ang Yvette (Defendant)Won