Tay Jia Wei Kenneth

Tay Jia Wei Kenneth is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and criminal law.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tay Jia Wei Kenneth has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and business litigation.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tay Jia Wei Kenneth has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tay Jia Wei Kenneth has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tay Jia Wei Kenneth has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tay Jia Wei Kenneth has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tay Jia Wei Kenneth has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tay Jia Wei Kenneth has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tay Jia Wei Kenneth has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tay Jia Wei Kenneth has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tay Jia Wei Kenneth has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tay Jia Wei Kenneth has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tay Jia Wei Kenneth has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Oaths and Declarations Act	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tay Jia Wei Kenneth has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tay Jia Wei Kenneth has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Cavenagh Law LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	Ewe Pang Kooi v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Forgery, ODA, and CDSA Offences(Dec 2022) Macquarie Bank v. Graceland Industry: Amendment of Pleadings in Commodity Swap Dispute(Jan 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tay Jia Wei Kenneth's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tay Jia Wei Kenneth's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Partial	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	9,500.00	9,500.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ewe Pang Kooi v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Forgery, ODA, and CDSA Offences 01 Dec 2022 Ewe Pang Kooi (Appellant)Lost	01 Dec 2022	Ewe Pang Kooi (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against the District Court's decision to order the imprisonment sentence to commence upon the expiry of the High Court sentence was dismissed.
2	Macquarie Bank v. Graceland Industry: Amendment of Pleadings in Commodity Swap Dispute 23 Jan 2018 MACQUARIE BANK LIMITED (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Partial	23 Jan 2018	MACQUARIE BANK LIMITED (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Costs awardedCosts of the application and costs in relation to consequential amendments to the pleadings were ordered to be paid by Graceland to Macquarie. Costs for the first hearing were fixed at $6,000, including disbursements. Additional costs for the second and third hearings were fixed at $3,500. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.