Tan Lee Jane

Tan Lee Jane is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and fiduciary duties. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Lee Jane has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and misrepresentation.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Lee Jane has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Lee Jane has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Tan Lee Jane has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Lee Jane has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Lee Jane has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Lee Jane has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Lee Jane has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Lee Jane has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Lee Jane has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Failure of consideration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Lee Jane has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Lee Jane has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Lee Jane has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Lee Jane has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Lee Jane has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Lee Jane has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Lee Jane has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Lee Jane has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Dishonest assistance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Lee Jane has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Lee Jane has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Case Management	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Lee Jane has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Lee Jane has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
cLegal LLC	2 cases	67% of cases	Zillion Global v Deutsche Bank: Breach of Contract, Negligence, and Misrepresentation in Wealth Management(Jul 2019) Epoch Minerals v Raffles Asset Management: Stay of Proceedings & Conspiracy to Defraud(Oct 2018)
Drew & Napier LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	Epoch Minerals v Raffles Asset Management: Conspiracy, Dishonest Assistance, and Misrepresentation in US$10M Loan Agreement(Dec 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Lee Jane's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 2 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	34.0 parties avg	4.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Lee Jane's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1
USD	700,000.00	700,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Epoch Minerals v Raffles Asset Management: Conspiracy, Dishonest Assistance, and Misrepresentation in US$10M Loan Agreement 16 Dec 2021 Gangadhara Brhmendra Srikanth Maroju (Defendant)Lost	16 Dec 2021	Gangadhara Brhmendra Srikanth Maroju (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the second, third, and fourth defendants for a total of US$700,000.
2	Zillion Global v Deutsche Bank: Breach of Contract, Negligence, and Misrepresentation in Wealth Management 11 Jul 2019 Fields Pacific Limited (Plaintiff)Lost	11 Jul 2019	Fields Pacific Limited (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed.
3	Epoch Minerals v Raffles Asset Management: Stay of Proceedings & Conspiracy to Defraud 07 Oct 2018 Gangadhara Brhmendra Srikanth Maroju (Defendant)Lost	07 Oct 2018	Gangadhara Brhmendra Srikanth Maroju (Defendant): Appeal dismissedAppeal for stay of proceedings dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).