Tan Kia Hua

Tan Kia Hua is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fiduciary duties and trust law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Kia Hua has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Tan Kia Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Tan Kia Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Tan Kia Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Kia Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Kia Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kia Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Kia Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Consumer Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Kia Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kia Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kia Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kia Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kia Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Kia Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Kia Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Kia Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Kia Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Taxation of Legal Fees	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kia Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Kia Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Kia Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Accessory liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Kia Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contracts for sale and supply of goods	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Kia Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Kia Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Assessment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Kia Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Kia Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Kia Hua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Kia Hua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Kia Hua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Kia Hua has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	5 cases	83% of cases	Dextra Partners v. Lavrentiadis: Breach of Trust & Fiduciary Duty in Fund Management(Mar 2021) CGS-CIMB Securities v Koh Yew Choo: Leave to Serve Rejoinder & Consumer Protection(Dec 2020) Lavrentiadis v Dextra Partners: Breach of Trust, Fiduciary Duty, and Accessory Liability(Jul 2020)
Chen Jiahua	1 cases	17% of cases	Shandong Qixia v Yong Zeng Yuan: Breach of Contract & Fiduciary Duties(Mar 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Kia Hua's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	17%
Partial	22.5 parties avg	2.5	33%
Won	32.7 parties avg	2.7	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Kia Hua's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(17%)	17%
Partial	2(33%)	33%
Won	3(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	65,000.00	65,000.001 cases	1
USD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Shandong Qixia v Yong Zeng Yuan: Breach of Contract & Fiduciary Duties 06 Mar 2022 Yong Zeng Yuan Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim)Lost	06 Mar 2022	Yong Zeng Yuan Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim): Counterclaim DismissedCounterclaims dismissed.
2	Dextra Partners v. Lavrentiadis: Breach of Trust & Fiduciary Duty in Fund Management 24 Mar 2021 Lavrentios Lavrentiadis (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	24 Mar 2021	Lavrentios Lavrentiadis (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part. Lavrentiadis was awarded costs in the sum of $65,000 (all-in) for both appeals and for SUM 13. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	CGS-CIMB Securities v Koh Yew Choo: Leave to Serve Rejoinder & Consumer Protection 20 Dec 2020 Koh Yew Choo (Defendant)Partial	20 Dec 2020	Koh Yew Choo (Defendant): Leave to serve rejoinder granted in partDefendant was granted leave to serve a rejoinder in order to set out the Unfair Contract Terms Act and Consumer Protection (Fair Trading) Act pleadings, but not the Miscellaneous Pleadings.
4	Lavrentiadis v Dextra Partners: Breach of Trust, Fiduciary Duty, and Accessory Liability 22 Jul 2020 Lavrentios Lavrentiadis (Plaintiff)Won	22 Jul 2020	Lavrentios Lavrentiadis (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff; monetary amount to be determined based on the findings of the court. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Zillion Global v Deutsche Bank: Breach of Contract, Negligence, and Misrepresentation in Wealth Management 11 Jul 2019 Deutsche Bank AG, Singapore Branch (Defendant)Won	11 Jul 2019	Deutsche Bank AG, Singapore Branch (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant.
6	Susan Lim v Singapore Medical Council: Appeal on Party-and-Party Costs for Disciplinary Hearings 08 Mar 2016 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Won	08 Mar 2016	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe appeal against the decision of the High Court Judge was dismissed, in favor of the Singapore Medical Council.