Suppiah Krishnamurthi

Suppiah Krishnamurthi is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and offences. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Suppiah Krishnamurthi has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Suppiah Krishnamurthi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	3 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Suppiah Krishnamurthi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Principles	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Suppiah Krishnamurthi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Offences	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Suppiah Krishnamurthi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Suppiah Krishnamurthi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Suppiah Krishnamurthi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Suppiah Krishnamurthi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Suppiah Krishnamurthi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Suppiah Krishnamurthi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Suppiah Krishnamurthi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
House-breaking	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Suppiah Krishnamurthi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Rape	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Suppiah Krishnamurthi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Mitigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Suppiah Krishnamurthi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Housebreaking	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Suppiah Krishnamurthi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Suppiah Krishnamurthi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Credit Agreement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Suppiah Krishnamurthi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Casinos and Gambling	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Suppiah Krishnamurthi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Suppiah Krishnamurthi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Suppiah Krishnamurthi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Suppiah Krishnamurthi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Suppiah Krishnamurthi has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Dhillon & Panoo LLC	3 cases	75% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Yap Pow Foo: Rape and House-breaking Sentencing(Mar 2023) Public Prosecutor v Yap Pow Foo: Rape and Housebreaking by Night(Jan 2023) Reduan v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking Appeal under Misuse of Drugs Act(Jun 2021)
Dhillon & Partners	1 cases	25% of cases	Marina Bay Sands v Ong Boon Lin: Enforceability of Casino Credit Agreement for Premium Player(Aug 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Suppiah Krishnamurthi's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.5 parties avg	2.5	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Suppiah Krishnamurthi's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	240,868.00	240,868.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Yap Pow Foo: Rape and House-breaking Sentencing 30 Mar 2023 Yap Pow Foo (Defendant)Lost	30 Mar 2023	Yap Pow Foo (Defendant): Accused SentencedAccused sentenced to 17 years’ imprisonment and 16 strokes of the cane.
2	Public Prosecutor v Yap Pow Foo: Rape and Housebreaking by Night 15 Jan 2023 Yap Pow Foo (Defendant)Lost	15 Jan 2023	Yap Pow Foo (Defendant): LostAccused found guilty on both charges.
3	Reduan v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking Appeal under Misuse of Drugs Act 29 Jun 2021 Nazeeha binte Abu Hasan (Appellant)Lost	29 Jun 2021	Nazeeha binte Abu Hasan (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
4	Marina Bay Sands v Ong Boon Lin: Enforceability of Casino Credit Agreement for Premium Player 25 Aug 2013 Ong Boon Lin Lester (Defendant)Lost	25 Aug 2013	Ong Boon Lin Lester (Defendant): Claim DismissedJudgment against the Defendant for the Principal Amount of $240,868.00, default interest on the Principal Amount of $240,868.00 at the contractual rate of 12% per annum calculated from 15 August 2010 until the date of receipt of full payment by the Plaintiff; and costs to be taxed on a standard basis unless otherwise agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.