Suhara binte Mohd Said

Suhara binte Mohd Said is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2002. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Suhara binte Mohd Said has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and conveyancing.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Suhara binte Mohd Said has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Suhara binte Mohd Said has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Suhara binte Mohd Said has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Suhara binte Mohd Said has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Suhara binte Mohd Said has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Suhara binte Mohd Said has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Suhara binte Mohd Said has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Suhara binte Mohd Said has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Suhara binte Mohd Said has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Suhara binte Mohd Said has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Suhara binte Mohd Said has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Suhara binte Mohd Said has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Suhara binte Mohd Said has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Sadari Musari & Partners	1 cases	100% of cases	Rahmatullah v Rohayaton: Specific Performance & Forgery in Property Sale(Sep 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Suhara binte Mohd Said's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	15.0 parties avg	5.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Suhara binte Mohd Said's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Rahmatullah v Rohayaton: Specific Performance & Forgery in Property Sale 19 Sep 2002 Rohaiyati binte Rohani (Defendant)Won	19 Sep 2002	Rohaiyati binte Rohani (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.