Subramaniam A Pillai

Subramaniam A Pillai is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2006. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in torts and contractual terms. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Subramaniam A Pillai has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contracts and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contracts	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Subramaniam A Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Subramaniam A Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Subramaniam A Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Subramaniam A Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Subramaniam A Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Subramaniam A Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Subramaniam A Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Subramaniam A Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Subramaniam A Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Subramaniam A Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fire Damage	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Subramaniam A Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Supply of Goods	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Subramaniam A Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Defective Work	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Subramaniam A Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Subramaniam A Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Foreseeability	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Subramaniam A Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Subramaniam A Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Subramaniam A Pillai has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
ACIES Law Corporation	2 cases	100% of cases	Wah Heng Glass v Diethelm Keller: Breach of Contract & Defective Work in Glass Supply(Feb 2006) Saatchi & Saatchi v Tan Hun Ling: Negligence, Fire Damage, and Landlord Liability(Dec 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Subramaniam A Pillai's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.0 parties avg	3.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Subramaniam A Pillai's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Wah Heng Glass v Diethelm Keller: Breach of Contract & Defective Work in Glass Supply 21 Feb 2006 Diethelm Keller Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	21 Feb 2006	Diethelm Keller Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim dismissedDefendant's counterclaim for defective work and material was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Saatchi & Saatchi v Tan Hun Ling: Negligence, Fire Damage, and Landlord Liability 14 Dec 2005 Tan Hun Ling (Defendant)Lost	14 Dec 2005	Tan Hun Ling (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the defendant with damages to be assessed by the Registrar. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.