Soo Ziyang Daniel

Soo Ziyang Daniel is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insolvency law and contract law. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 14% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Soo Ziyang Daniel has demonstrated expertise across 32 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Soo Ziyang Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Soo Ziyang Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Costs	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Soo Ziyang Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Soo Ziyang Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Soo Ziyang Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Soo Ziyang Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Soo Ziyang Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Soo Ziyang Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Soo Ziyang Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Soo Ziyang Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Soo Ziyang Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Soo Ziyang Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Soo Ziyang Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Soo Ziyang Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Soo Ziyang Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Soo Ziyang Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Soo Ziyang Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Soo Ziyang Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Soo Ziyang Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Soo Ziyang Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Soo Ziyang Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Domain Name Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Soo Ziyang Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Cybersquatting	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Soo Ziyang Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Soo Ziyang Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Fees Assessment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Soo Ziyang Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Soo Ziyang Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Soo Ziyang Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Soo Ziyang Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Soo Ziyang Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recognition of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Soo Ziyang Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Soo Ziyang Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Soo Ziyang Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Soo Ziyang Daniel has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Selvam LLC	6 cases	86% of cases	DB International Trust v Medora Xerxes Jamshid: Removal of Liquidator in Winding Up(Apr 2023) Re Kirkham International: Retrospective Solicitor Appointment Under IRDA(Jan 2023) Chen Aun-Li Andrew v Ha Chi Kut: Enforcement of Foreign Judgment under REFJA(Nov 2022)
Drew & Napier LLC	1 cases	14% of cases	Kao Chai-Chau Linda v Fong Wai Lyn Carolyn: Dispute over Receivers and Managers' Fees in Airtrust (Singapore) Insolvency(Oct 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Soo Ziyang Daniel's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 1 (14%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.3 parties avg	2.3	57%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	14%
Partial	33.3 parties avg	3.3	43%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2020	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	22.7 parties avg	2.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Soo Ziyang Daniel's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(50%)	50%
Neutral	1(13%)	13%
Partial	3(38%)	38%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	550,463.73	110,092.755 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	DB International Trust v Medora Xerxes Jamshid: Removal of Liquidator in Winding Up 03 Apr 2023 Kirkham International Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent)Neutral	03 Apr 2023	Kirkham International Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent): Liquidator RemovedThe liquidator of the second respondent was removed.
2	Re Kirkham International: Retrospective Solicitor Appointment Under IRDA 24 Jan 2023 Medora Xerxes Jamshid (Applicant)Partial	24 Jan 2023	Medora Xerxes Jamshid (Applicant): Application Granted in PartApplicant authorized to appoint solicitors from the date of the order, with legal costs to be paid from the assets of the company. Costs of the application fixed at $4,500 excluding disbursements, to be borne out of the assets of the Company. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Chen Aun-Li Andrew v Ha Chi Kut: Enforcement of Foreign Judgment under REFJA 30 Nov 2022 Chen Aun-Li Andrew (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	30 Nov 2022	Chen Aun-Li Andrew (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; appellant ordered to pay costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Ha Chi Kut v Chen Aun-Li Andrew: Enforcement of Foreign Judgment under REFJA 26 Jun 2022 Chen Aun-Li Andrew (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	26 Jun 2022	Chen Aun-Li Andrew (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed, Registration Order to stand. Costs fixed at S$8,000 (inclusive of disbursements) to Mdm Ha. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Lim Anthony v Gao Wenxi: Oppression, Contract, and Misrepresentation in Shareholder Dispute 05 Apr 2020 Lim Anthony (Plaintiff)Partial	05 Apr 2020	Lim Anthony (Plaintiff): Claim Allowed in PartJudgment for the Plaintiff for $100,000 against Gao and $450,000 against the Company, less $12,036.27 owed to the Company (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	3 Corporate Services v Grabtaxi: Domain Name Dispute & Cybersquatting 21 Jan 2020 3 Corporate Services Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	21 Jan 2020	3 Corporate Services Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs awarded to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Kao Chai-Chau Linda v Fong Wai Lyn Carolyn: Dispute over Receivers and Managers' Fees in Airtrust (Singapore) Insolvency 13 Oct 2015 Kao Chai-Chau Linda (Plaintiff)Partial	13 Oct 2015	Kao Chai-Chau Linda (Plaintiff): Fees reducedFees reduced by the court. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.