Sim Lin Piah

Sim Lin Piah is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2001. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in land law and property law.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sim Lin Piah has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in land law and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Land Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sim Lin Piah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sim Lin Piah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sim Lin Piah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sim Lin Piah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Caveats	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sim Lin Piah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Adverse Possession	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sim Lin Piah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Bona Fide Purchaser	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sim Lin Piah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Land Titles Act	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sim Lin Piah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sim Lin Piah has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Toh Tan & Partners	1 cases	100% of cases	Liwen Holdings v Ng Ker San: Adverse Possession & Land Title Dispute(Apr 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sim Lin Piah's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sim Lin Piah's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Liwen Holdings v Ng Ker San: Adverse Possession & Land Title Dispute 15 Apr 2001 Liwen Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Neutral	15 Apr 2001	Liwen Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Order accordinglyCourt ordered a trial of the factual issue of whether adverse possession was acquired by 1 March 1994. The court held that if adverse possession has crystallized before 1 March 1994, the owners of 1 and 3 Bedok Rise have become the owners of the disputed plot and their rights and interests over the said plot cannot be overreached by the events thereafter. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.