Sarbjit Singh

Sarbjit Singh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and director's duties. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated expertise across 40 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	6 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	5 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Business Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Ownership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Directors' Liabilities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Best Particulars	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ship Design	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Financial Consultancy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Oppression	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rule in Turquand's case	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sarbjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sarbjit Singh has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Lim & Lim	5 cases	50% of cases	Denmark Skibstekniske v Ultrapolis: Enforcement of Danish Arbitration Award in Singapore(Apr 2010) Abdul Salam Asanaru Pillai v Nomanbhoy & Sons: Security for Costs Application(Apr 2008) Loh Sze Ti v Gay Choon Ing: Beneficial Ownership of Shares & Breach of Trust(Feb 2008)
Selvam LLC	2 cases	20% of cases	Prima Bulkship v Lim Say Wan: Directors' Duties & Breach in Creditors' Voluntary Liquidation(Dec 2016) Prima Bulkship v Lim Say Wan: Application for Better Particulars and Director's Duties(Apr 2015)
Kerta & Co	1 cases	10% of cases	Alliance Entertainment v Sim Kay Teck: Striking Out, Res Judicata & Issue Estoppel in Copyright Infringement(Jul 2006)
Lim and Lim	1 cases	10% of cases	Stone Forest Consulting Pte Ltd v Wee Poh Holdings Ltd: Summary Judgment for Unpaid Consulting Fees(Jun 2004)
M/s Lim & Lim	1 cases	10% of cases	Chun Thong Ping v Soh Kok Hong: Summary Judgment and Amendment of Statement of Claim(Aug 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sarbjit Singh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.9
Complex Cases: 2 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	52.7 parties avg	2.7	50%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	10%
Won	43.0 parties avg	3.0	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2016	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sarbjit Singh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(50%)	50%
Partial	1(10%)	10%
Won	4(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
EUR	393,261.00	393,261.001 cases	1
SGD	1,880,615.73	268,659.397 cases	7

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 10 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Prima Bulkship v Lim Say Wan: Directors' Duties & Breach in Creditors' Voluntary Liquidation 26 Dec 2016 Lim Say Wan (Defendant)Won	26 Dec 2016	Lim Say Wan (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; costs to be paid by the plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Prima Bulkship v Lim Say Wan: Application for Better Particulars and Director's Duties 19 Apr 2015 Lim Say Wan (Defendant)Partial	19 Apr 2015	Lim Say Wan (Defendant): Application for better particulars allowed in partDefendant's application for better particulars was allowed in part.
3	Denmark Skibstekniske v Ultrapolis: Enforcement of Danish Arbitration Award in Singapore 08 Apr 2010 Ultrapolis 3000 Investments Ltd (formerly known as Ultrapolis 3000 Theme Park Investments Ltd) (Respondent)Lost	08 Apr 2010	Ultrapolis 3000 Investments Ltd (formerly known as Ultrapolis 3000 Theme Park Investments Ltd) (Respondent): Enforcement of Corrected Award grantedUltrapolis 3000 Investments Ltd (formerly Ultrapolis 3000 Theme Park Investments Ltd.) is ordered to pay to Denmark Skibstekniske Konsulenter A/S i likvidation (formerly Knud E. Hansen A/S) EUR 357,855.00 with interest 1.5% per month of:- i. EUR 7,892 from 25 March 2006 until payment; ii. EUR 100,000 from 14 April 2006 until payment; iii. EUR 863 from 3 May 2006 until payment; iv. EUR 249,100 from 30 June 2006 until payment; within 14 days from the award (i.e. from 16 April 2009). Ultrapolis 3000 Investments Ltd. (formerly Ultrapolis 3000 Theme Park Investments Ltd.) is ordered to refund EUR 23,406 to Denmark Skibstekniske Konsulenter A/S i likvidation (formerly Knud E Hanswen A/S) as costs of the arbitration case within 14 days from the date of the award (i.e. from 16 April 2009). Ultrapolis 3000 Investments Ltd. (formerly Ultrapolis 3000 Theme Park Investments Ltd.) is ordered to refund EUR 12,000 to Denmark Skibstekniske Konsulenter A/S i likvidation (formerly Knud E Hansen A/S) as costs of Denmark Skibstekniske Konsulenter A/S i likvidation (formerly Knud E Hansen A/S) within 14 days from the date of the award (i.e. from 16 April 2009).
4	Abdul Salam Asanaru Pillai v Nomanbhoy & Sons: Security for Costs Application 02 Apr 2008 Vallinayagam Dheenathayalavel (Second Defendant)Lost	02 Apr 2008	Vallinayagam Dheenathayalavel (Second Defendant): Security for costs to be providedSecond defendant ordered to provide $30,000 as security for costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Loh Sze Ti v Gay Choon Ing: Beneficial Ownership of Shares & Breach of Trust 27 Feb 2008 Gay Choon Ing (Defendant)Lost	27 Feb 2008	Gay Choon Ing (Defendant): POA RescindedThe Points of Agreement was rescinded, and Loh is to return the sum of $1.5 million to Gay. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Alliance Entertainment v Sim Kay Teck: Striking Out, Res Judicata & Issue Estoppel in Copyright Infringement 17 Jul 2006 Dallas Entertainment Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	17 Jul 2006	Dallas Entertainment Pte Ltd (Defendant): Striking-out application dismissedThe defendants' application to strike out the plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Stone Forest Consulting Pte Ltd v Wee Poh Holdings Ltd: Summary Judgment for Unpaid Consulting Fees 18 Jun 2004 Stone Forest Consulting Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	18 Jun 2004	Stone Forest Consulting Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Judgment for PlaintiffSummary judgment awarded to the plaintiff for $348,715.73, interest, and costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Chun Thong Ping v Soh Kok Hong: Summary Judgment and Amendment of Statement of Claim 07 Aug 2003 Soh Kok Hong (Defendant)Won	07 Aug 2003	Soh Kok Hong (Defendant): Costs awardedCosts of $1500 and $400 were awarded to the Second Defendant against the Plaintiff for the withdrawal of the appeal and the application to amend respectively (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Kitnasamy v Nagatheran: Interlocutory Injunction & Minority Oppression under Section 216 of Companies Act 21 Mar 2000 Kitnasamy s/o Marudapan (Appellant)Won	21 Mar 2000	Kitnasamy s/o Marudapan (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed and interlocutory injunction granted.
10	Kitnasamy v Nagatheran: Injunction Against Director Removal at Extraordinary General Meeting 10 Feb 2000 Kitnasamy s/o Marudapan (Plaintiff)Lost	10 Feb 2000	Kitnasamy s/o Marudapan (Plaintiff): Application dismissedThe plaintiff's application for an injunction was dismissed.