Sant Singh

Sant Singh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and road traffic act. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Sant Singh has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and evidence.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	5 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sant Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Sant Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sant Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Sant Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Sant Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sant Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sant Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
White Collar Crime	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sant Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sant Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sant Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sant Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Drink Driving	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Sant Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Sant Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Sant Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sant Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sant Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Sant Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Sant Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Breach of Trust	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Sant Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Immigration Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sant Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sant Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Securities Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sant Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Sant Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Sant Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Sant Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Sant Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Sant Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Sant Singh has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Rajah & Cheah	3 cases	50% of cases	Heng Tze Yong v Public Prosecutor: Corruption Offenses & Sentencing Appeal(Sep 2017) Dong Ching Jit v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Corruption Conviction Allowed(Aug 2010) Lim Kay Han Irene v Public Prosecutor: Drink Driving & Mitigating Circumstances(Mar 2010)
Sant Singh Partnership	3 cases	50% of cases	Shapy Khan v PP: Criminal Breach of Trust & Securities Industry Act Violation(May 2003) Low Lin Lin v Public Prosecutor: Cocaine Possession, Presumption of Possession, Adverse Inference(Aug 2002) PP v Tubbs: Negligence, Road Accidents, and Standard of Care for Drivers(Aug 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sant Singh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Won	42.0 parties avg	2.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2010	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sant Singh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(33%)	33%
Won	4(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	35,000.00	17,500.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Heng Tze Yong v Public Prosecutor: Corruption Offenses & Sentencing Appeal 13 Sep 2017 Heng Tze Yong (Appellant)Won	13 Sep 2017	Heng Tze Yong (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed, and the imprisonment term was substituted with a fine of $35,000 (Singapore Dollars).
2	Dong Ching Jit v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Corruption Conviction Allowed 19 Aug 2010 Dong Ching Jit (Appellant)Won	19 Aug 2010	Dong Ching Jit (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal against conviction allowed and acquitted of all four charges.
3	Lim Kay Han Irene v Public Prosecutor: Drink Driving & Mitigating Circumstances 16 Mar 2010 Lim Kay Han Irene (Appellant)Won	16 Mar 2010	Lim Kay Han Irene (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed, and the imprisonment term was set aside.
4	Shapy Khan v PP: Criminal Breach of Trust & Securities Industry Act Violation 25 May 2003 Shapy Khan s/o Sher Khan (Appellant)Lost	25 May 2003	Shapy Khan s/o Sher Khan (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against his conviction and sentence was dismissed.
5	Low Lin Lin v Public Prosecutor: Cocaine Possession, Presumption of Possession, Adverse Inference 29 Aug 2002 Low Lin Lin (Appellant)Lost	29 Aug 2002	Low Lin Lin (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against her conviction for possession of cocaine was dismissed.
6	PP v Tubbs: Negligence, Road Accidents, and Standard of Care for Drivers 05 Aug 2001 Tubbs Julia Elizabeth (Respondent)Won	05 Aug 2001	Tubbs Julia Elizabeth (Respondent): Acquittal UpheldThe respondent's acquittal on the charge of causing death by negligent act was upheld.