Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim

Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in legal profession act and unauthorised person acting as advocate or solicitor. Their track record shows a 8.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated expertise across 58 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and evidence.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	10 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Remuneration	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unauthorised person acting as advocate or solicitor	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fibromyalgia	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Land	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Freezing Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equitable Lien	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Caveats	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Priority of Creditors	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Presumption of fact in loans of money	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Priorities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Purchaser's Lien	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Writ of Seizure and Sale	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Transfer of Cases	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restraint of foreign proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 12 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Salem Ibrahim LLC	12 cases	100% of cases	SW Trustees v. Teodros Ashenafi: Amendment Application, Conspiracy, Limitation Act(Sep 2023) SW Trustees v. Tesemma: Security for Costs Application in Liquidation(May 2023) Choo Cheng Tong Wilfred v Phua Swee Khiang: Legal Profession Act & Remuneration for Unauthorised Legal Services(Feb 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.2
Complex Cases: 3 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	64.6 parties avg	4.6	50%
Partial	54.0 parties avg	4.0	42%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	8%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2022	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	28.0 parties avg	8.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Salem bin Mohamed Ibrahim's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(50%)	50%
Partial	5(42%)	42%
Won	1(8%)	8%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,857,975.14	408,282.167 cases	7

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	SW Trustees v. Teodros Ashenafi: Amendment Application, Conspiracy, Limitation Act 28 Sep 2023 Farooq Ahmad Mann (Plaintiff)Lost	28 Sep 2023	Farooq Ahmad Mann (Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedPlaintiffs' application to amend the Statement of Claim was denied.
2	SW Trustees v. Tesemma: Security for Costs Application in Liquidation 30 May 2023 Farooq Ahmad Mann (Plaintiff)Partial	30 May 2023	Farooq Ahmad Mann (Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part to the extent that the first defendant is entitled to security for costs in respect of the costs of trial and post-trial work.
3	Choo Cheng Tong Wilfred v Phua Swee Khiang: Legal Profession Act & Remuneration for Unauthorised Legal Services 08 Feb 2022 Choo Cheng Tong Wilfred (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	08 Feb 2022	Choo Cheng Tong Wilfred (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedChoo is to pay costs of $45,000 to Phua inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Choo Cheng Tong Wilfred v Phua Swee Khiang: Application for Transfer of Appeal on Legal Profession Act Interpretation 24 Jan 2022 Choo Cheng Tong Wilfred (Applicant)Lost	24 Jan 2022	Choo Cheng Tong Wilfred (Applicant): Application dismissedThe application for the transfer of the appeal to the Court of Appeal was dismissed.
5	Singapore Air Charter v Peter Low & Choo LLC: Priority of Judgment Creditors in Property Sale 13 Oct 2020 Singapore Air Charter Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	13 Oct 2020	Singapore Air Charter Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Singapore Air Charter Pte Ltd to pay Peter Low & Choo LLC $50,000 inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Mulacek v Civelli: Appeal on Forum Non Conveniens and Anti-Suit Injunction in Breach of Contract and Fiduciary Duty Claims 14 Jun 2020 Philippe Emanuel Mulacek (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	14 Jun 2020	Philippe Emanuel Mulacek (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs and disbursements fixed at a global figure of $45,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Peter Low & Choo LLC v Singapore Air Charter: Priority of Writs of Seizure and Sale under Land Titles Act 01 Apr 2019 Singapore Air Charter Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	01 Apr 2019	Singapore Air Charter Pte Ltd (Respondent): Claim DismissedThe applicant is entitled to Danial Patrick Higgins’ interest in the Surplus Proceeds from the sale of the Property in priority over the first respondent.
8	PACC Offshore Services v Kensteel Engineering: Equitable Lien & Caveat Dispute in Property Sale 14 May 2017 Kensteel Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	14 May 2017	Kensteel Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant): Caveat to remain unless the defendant is able to provide an alternative form of securityThe court ordered that the caveat remain in place pending the outcome of Suit 898, unless the defendant provides security for the plaintiff's claim for the return of the deposit in the amount of $4,066,000.
9	TQH v TQI: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Wife's Maintenance Claim Post-Divorce 24 Jul 2016 TQH (Plaintiff)Partial	24 Jul 2016	TQH (Plaintiff): Division of Matrimonial AssetsThe Husband is to transfer his rights, title and interest in Fernwood Property to the Wife and pay the Wife a further amount of $1,152,364 (to the nearest dollar) within four months from the date of this judgment. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Mykytowych v VIP Hotel: Damages Assessment for Slip and Fall Injury 13 Jul 2016 Pamela Jane Mykytowych (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	13 Jul 2016	Pamela Jane Mykytowych (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part; damages awarded increased from $9,005.12 to $56,605.53 (50% of $113,211.06).
11	Mykytowych v V I P Hotel: Negligence Claim for Hotel Lobby Slip and Fall Resulting in Knee Fracture and Alleged Complex Regional Pain Syndrome 18 May 2015 Pamela Jane Mykytowych (Plaintiff)Partial	18 May 2015	Pamela Jane Mykytowych (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $9,005.115 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	SRS Commerce Ltd v Yuji Imabeppu: Appeal on Setting Aside Service of Process for Misappropriation 22 Oct 2014 SRS Commerce Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	22 Oct 2014	SRS Commerce Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs to the plaintiffs to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.