Ross Tan

Ross Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2011 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and landlord and tenant law. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ross Tan has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Ross Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Ross Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ross Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ross Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ross Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ross Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ross Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ross Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ross Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ross Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ross Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ross Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ross Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ross Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Collateral Management	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ross Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Warehouseman Liability	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ross Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ross Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trade Financing	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ross Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ross Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ross Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ross Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ross Tan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	3 cases	100% of cases	H P Construction v Chin Ivan: Stay of Proceedings for Alleged Fraud in Architect's Certificates(Jul 2014) Khew Kim Kee v Sim Jo-Lin: Tenant's Obligation to Pay Rent Despite Alleged Defects(Nov 2012) ABN AMRO Bank v CWT Commodities: Collateral Management Agreement & Warehouseman's Duty(Jan 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ross Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ross Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	335,875.00	111,958.333 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	H P Construction v Chin Ivan: Stay of Proceedings for Alleged Fraud in Architect's Certificates 09 Jul 2014 Chin Ivan (Defendant, Respondent)Partial	09 Jul 2014	Chin Ivan (Defendant, Respondent): Partial Stay GrantedStay of proceedings granted for the disputed items. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Khew Kim Kee v Sim Jo-Lin: Tenant's Obligation to Pay Rent Despite Alleged Defects 25 Nov 2012 Khew Kim Kee (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	25 Nov 2012	Khew Kim Kee (Plaintiff, Respondent): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff for outstanding rent of $1,875, mesne profits, interest, and costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	ABN AMRO Bank v CWT Commodities: Collateral Management Agreement & Warehouseman's Duty 16 Jan 2011 ABN AMRO Bank NV, Singapore Branch (Plaintiff)Lost	16 Jan 2011	ABN AMRO Bank NV, Singapore Branch (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim against the defendant was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.