Richard Sam

Richard Sam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in divorce and family law. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Richard Sam has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in property law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Property Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Richard Sam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Richard Sam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Richard Sam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Richard Sam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Richard Sam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Richard Sam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Partnership Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Richard Sam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Home	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Richard Sam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Richard Sam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Richard Sam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Richard Sam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Richard Sam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Richard Sam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Richard Sam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Club Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Richard Sam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Richard Sam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Public Entertainment Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Richard Sam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Richard Sam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Richard Sam has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Sam & Wijaya	2 cases	67% of cases	Ang Kin Chiew v Ang Boon Chye: Partnership Dispute over Food Court Businesses(Apr 2006) Chin Hong Oon Ronny v Tanah Merah Country Club: Disciplinary Proceedings & Natural Justice(May 2001)
Sam & Associates	1 cases	33% of cases	Rengarajoo Prema v Rengarajoo: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Exercise of Option to Purchase Property(Jul 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Richard Sam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 9.5
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	210.6 parties avg	10.6	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	112.0 parties avg	12.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Richard Sam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Rengarajoo Prema v Rengarajoo: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Exercise of Option to Purchase Property 14 Jul 2010 Rengarajoo s/o Rengasamy Balasamy (Respondent)Won	14 Jul 2010	Rengarajoo s/o Rengasamy Balasamy (Respondent): Application grantedHusband's application for sale of property granted. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Ang Kin Chiew v Ang Boon Chye: Partnership Dispute over Food Court Businesses 06 Apr 2006 Ang Choon Siang (Defendant)Won	06 Apr 2006	Ang Choon Siang (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Chin Hong Oon Ronny v Tanah Merah Country Club: Disciplinary Proceedings & Natural Justice 20 May 2001 Chin Hong Oon Ronny (Plaintiff)Lost	20 May 2001	Chin Hong Oon Ronny (Plaintiff): Application DismissedOriginating summons dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.