Raymond Tan

Raymond Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2009. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and divorce. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Raymond Tan has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in child custody and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Child Custody	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Raymond Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Raymond Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Raymond Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Raymond Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized99% relevance score	Raymond Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Raymond Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Care and Control	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Raymond Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Access to Children	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Raymond Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Raymond Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Raymond Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Raymond Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Corporate Secretarial Services	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Raymond Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Raymond Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Raymond Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Raymond Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Raymond Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Raymond Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Raymond Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Raymond Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Raymond Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Raymond Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Raymond Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Raymond Tan has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
T H Tan Raymond & Co	1 cases	33% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Heng Swee Weng: Outrage of Modesty & Sentencing Principles for Public Transport Users(Dec 2009)
H L Wee & Co	1 cases	33% of cases	Tan Khye Hua v Hong Chor Luan: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Maintenance in Divorce(Jan 2000)
David Siow Chua & Tan	1 cases	33% of cases	Lumbini Pte Ltd v Toh Peng Noi: Transfer of Business Assets Dispute(Apr 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Raymond Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	25.0 parties avg	5.0	67%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Raymond Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Partial	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Heng Swee Weng: Outrage of Modesty & Sentencing Principles for Public Transport Users 02 Dec 2009 Heng Swee Weng (Respondent)Lost	02 Dec 2009	Heng Swee Weng (Respondent): Sentence IncreasedThe Respondent's sentence was increased from a fine of $2,000 to eight weeks' imprisonment.
2	Lumbini Pte Ltd v Toh Peng Noi: Transfer of Business Assets Dispute 23 Apr 2002 Lumbini Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	23 Apr 2002	Lumbini Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedLumbini's claims against all defendants were dismissed.
3	Tan Khye Hua v Hong Chor Luan: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Maintenance in Divorce 10 Jan 2000 Hong Chor Luan (Respondent)Partial	10 Jan 2000	Hong Chor Luan (Respondent): Orders made against her regarding division of matrimonial assets, maintenance, and costs.Orders made against her regarding division of matrimonial assets, maintenance, and costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.