Ravinran Kumaran

Ravinran Kumaran is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fraud and deceit and breach of contract. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ravinran Kumaran has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in misrepresentation and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Misrepresentation	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Ravinran Kumaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Ravinran Kumaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ravinran Kumaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ravinran Kumaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ravinran Kumaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ravinran Kumaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ravinran Kumaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ravinran Kumaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Oral Agreement	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ravinran Kumaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ravinran Kumaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ravinran Kumaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Ravinran Kumaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ravinran Kumaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ravinran Kumaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Leasing Agreements	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ravinran Kumaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ravinran Kumaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ravinran Kumaran has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Relianze Law Corporation	1 cases	50% of cases	Ahmad Ebrahim v Ilangchizian Manogaran: Breach of Oral Agreement & Undue Influence(Jul 2019)
Ravi Lim & Partners	1 cases	50% of cases	Orix Capital Ltd v Symrise Holding Pte Ltd: Leasing Dispute & Fraud Allegations(May 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ravinran Kumaran's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	15.0 parties avg	5.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ravinran Kumaran's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ahmad Ebrahim v Ilangchizian Manogaran: Breach of Oral Agreement & Undue Influence 14 Jul 2019 Ilangchizian Manogaran (Defendant)Won	14 Jul 2019	Ilangchizian Manogaran (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the Defendant; the Plaintiff's claims were dismissed. The Defendant was awarded costs, to be assessed on a standard basis until the date of the offer to settle, and on an indemnity basis thereafter.
2	Orix Capital Ltd v Symrise Holding Pte Ltd: Leasing Dispute & Fraud Allegations 27 May 2008 Jai Singh (Third Party)Neutral	27 May 2008	Jai Singh (Third Party): No Order on CostsNo order on costs is made with respect to the third party proceedings. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.