Ravin Periasamy

Ravin Periasamy is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in misrepresentation and enforcement of foreign judgments. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 40% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ravin Periasamy has demonstrated expertise across 34 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ravin Periasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ravin Periasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Ravin Periasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice17% relevance score	Ravin Periasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Ravin Periasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ravin Periasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ravin Periasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ravin Periasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ravin Periasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ravin Periasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ravin Periasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ravin Periasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ravin Periasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ravin Periasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ravin Periasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assignment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ravin Periasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ravin Periasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ravin Periasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligent misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ravin Periasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Choice of Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ravin Periasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ravin Periasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ravin Periasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ravin Periasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ravin Periasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Choses in Action	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ravin Periasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Singapore International Commercial Court	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ravin Periasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Presumption of Similarity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ravin Periasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Alteration of Position	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ravin Periasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inducement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ravin Periasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Leases	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ravin Periasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ravin Periasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ravin Periasamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ravin Periasamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ravin Periasamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ravin Periasamy has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	2 cases	40% of cases	Sea Trucks Offshore Ltd v Roomans: Mareva Injunctions & Disclosure Obligations(Nov 2018) IM Skaugen v MAN Diesel: Misrepresentation, Assignment, and Forum in Marine Engine Fuel Consumption Dispute(May 2018)
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	2 cases	40% of cases	Defu Furniture v RBC Properties: Rescission of Lease for Misrepresentation(Jan 2014) Re International Formwork & Scaffolding: Provisional Liquidators' Equitable Lien & Priority of Fees(Oct 2013)
Dentons Rodyk & Davison LLP	1 cases	20% of cases	Man Diesel & Turbo SE v I.M. Skaugen: Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award & Adjournment Proceedings(May 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ravin Periasamy's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.1
Complex Cases: 2 (40%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	34.8 parties avg	4.8	60%
Won	23.3 parties avg	3.3	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	11.0 parties avg	1.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	35.2 parties avg	5.2

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ravin Periasamy's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(60%)	60%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sea Trucks Offshore Ltd v Roomans: Mareva Injunctions & Disclosure Obligations 15 Nov 2018 Mariah Binte Mahat (Defendant)Lost	15 Nov 2018	Mariah Binte Mahat (Defendant): Application to vary the disclosure obligations under the Mareva injunction disallowed.Application to vary the disclosure obligations under the Mareva injunction disallowed.
2	Man Diesel & Turbo SE v I.M. Skaugen: Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award & Adjournment Proceedings 27 May 2018 IM Skaugen Marine Services Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	27 May 2018	IM Skaugen Marine Services Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application DismissedDefendant's application to challenge enforcement of the DIA Final Award was dismissed.
3	IM Skaugen v MAN Diesel: Misrepresentation, Assignment, and Forum in Marine Engine Fuel Consumption Dispute 24 May 2018 IM Skaugen Marine Services Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	24 May 2018	IM Skaugen Marine Services Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, Singapore is the appropriate forum.
4	Defu Furniture v RBC Properties: Rescission of Lease for Misrepresentation 01 Jan 2014 Defu Furniture Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	01 Jan 2014	Defu Furniture Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff; rescission of the lease and damages awarded (currency assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Re International Formwork & Scaffolding: Provisional Liquidators' Equitable Lien & Priority of Fees 27 Oct 2013 International Formwork & Scaffolding Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	27 Oct 2013	International Formwork & Scaffolding Pte Ltd (Respondent): Order granted for payment of provisional liquidators' fees and expensesOrder granted for liquidators to pay provisional liquidators' fees and expenses, confirming their equitable lien over all company assets. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.