Ravi Arumugam

Ravi Arumugam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in personal injury and trust law. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ravi Arumugam has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and personal injury.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ravi Arumugam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ravi Arumugam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ravi Arumugam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ravi Arumugam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ravi Arumugam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ravi Arumugam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ravi Arumugam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ravi Arumugam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ravi Arumugam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ravi Arumugam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ravi Arumugam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ravi Arumugam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ravi Arumugam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ravi Arumugam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ravi Arumugam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ravi Arumugam has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wong Alliance LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	Ng Yok v Ng Geok Lan: Constructive Trust, Fraudulent Misappropriation of Funds(Mar 2018)
Ravi & Associates	1 cases	33% of cases	Mullaichelvan v Lee: Assessment of Damages for Road Traffic Accident Injuries(Jan 2013)
C K Tan & Co	1 cases	33% of cases	MEP Systems v Azuma Engineering: Option to Purchase Dispute over JTC Confirmation Letter(Sep 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ravi Arumugam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ravi Arumugam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	741,795.84	370,897.922 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ng Yok v Ng Geok Lan: Constructive Trust, Fraudulent Misappropriation of Funds 05 Mar 2018 Ng Yok (Plaintiff)Won	05 Mar 2018	Ng Yok (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the court granted a declaration that the defendant held monies on trust for the plaintiff and ordering an account and an inquiry. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Mullaichelvan v Lee: Assessment of Damages for Road Traffic Accident Injuries 20 Jan 2013 Mullaichelvan s/o Perumal (Plaintiff)Won	20 Jan 2013	Mullaichelvan s/o Perumal (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $741,795.84 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	MEP Systems v Azuma Engineering: Option to Purchase Dispute over JTC Confirmation Letter 21 Sep 2010 Azuma Engineering (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	21 Sep 2010	Azuma Engineering (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).