Rajmohan

Rajmohan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2006. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and banking law. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Rajmohan has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil practice and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Practice	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Rajmohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rajmohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rajmohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rajmohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Rajmohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rajmohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Rajmohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Rajmohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Rajmohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Rajmohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rajmohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Champerty	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Rajmohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajmohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Rajmohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Rajmohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Rajmohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Conclusive Evidence Clause	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Rajmohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banker’s set-off	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Rajmohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Rajmohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Certificate of registration of charge	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Rajmohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Rajmohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Rajmohan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Haq & Selvam	2 cases	67% of cases	Otech Pakistan v Clough Engineering: Champerty, Contract Formation & Revision(Dec 2006) Pertamina Energy Trading v Credit Suisse: Fraudulent Drawdown & Banker's Set-Off(Aug 2006)
Haq and Selvam	1 cases	33% of cases	Karaha Bodas Co LLC v Pertamina Energy Trading Ltd: Amendment of Pleadings & Mareva Injunctions(Oct 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Rajmohan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	67%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2006	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Rajmohan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Otech Pakistan v Clough Engineering: Champerty, Contract Formation & Revision 26 Dec 2006 Otech Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Appellant)Lost	26 Dec 2006	Otech Pakistan Pvt Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedOtech's appeal was dismissed as the court found no agreement to vary the remuneration formula.
2	Pertamina Energy Trading v Credit Suisse: Fraudulent Drawdown & Banker's Set-Off 14 Aug 2006 Pertamina Energy Trading Limited (Appellant)Lost	14 Aug 2006	Pertamina Energy Trading Limited (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Karaha Bodas Co LLC v Pertamina Energy Trading Ltd: Amendment of Pleadings & Mareva Injunctions 11 Oct 2005 Pertamina Energy Services Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	11 Oct 2005	Pertamina Energy Services Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the originating summons and Mareva injunction against Pertamina Energy Services Pte Ltd were set aside.