Radika Mariapan

Radika Mariapan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2011 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in building and construction industry security of payment act and construction law. Their track record shows a 14.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Radika Mariapan has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and building and construction industry security of payment act.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	16% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Radika Mariapan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	4 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Radika Mariapan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	4 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Radika Mariapan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Radika Mariapan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Radika Mariapan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Dispute Resolution	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Radika Mariapan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Radika Mariapan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Radika Mariapan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Radika Mariapan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Radika Mariapan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Radika Mariapan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Radika Mariapan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Radika Mariapan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Radika Mariapan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Forfeiture of Lease	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Radika Mariapan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Radika Mariapan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Radika Mariapan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Radika Mariapan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Adjudication Determination	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Radika Mariapan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
State Land Rules	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Radika Mariapan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Radika Mariapan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Radika Mariapan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Radika Mariapan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conveyance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Radika Mariapan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Radika Mariapan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Eldan Law LLP	4 cases	67% of cases	Associate Dynamic Builder v Tactic Foundation: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination under Security of Payment Act(Jun 2013) Shin Khai Construction v FL Wong Construction: Adjudication Determination & Security of Payment Act(Jan 2013) Garden Hub v Attorney-General: Relief Against Forfeiture & State Tenancy Termination(Jan 2012)
I.R.B Law LLP	2 cases	33% of cases	Grouteam Pte Ltd v UES Holdings Pte Ltd: Building & Construction Law, Security of Payment Act, Adjudication Determination(Oct 2016) UES Holdings v Grouteam: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination for Out-of-Time Payment Claim under SOPA(Oct 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Radika Mariapan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.3 parties avg	2.3	67%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	17%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Radika Mariapan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(57%)	57%
Neutral	1(14%)	14%
Partial	1(14%)	14%
Won	1(14%)	14%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2012	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Grouteam Pte Ltd v UES Holdings Pte Ltd: Building & Construction Law, Security of Payment Act, Adjudication Determination 25 Oct 2016 GROUTEAM PTE LTD (Appellant)Won	25 Oct 2016	GROUTEAM PTE LTD (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs here and below to the appellant. The court is minded to fix these costs, and the parties are to submit written submissions setting out their arguments as to the appropriate quantum of these costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	UES Holdings v Grouteam: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination for Out-of-Time Payment Claim under SOPA 25 Oct 2015 GROUTEAM PTE LTD (Defendant)Lost	25 Oct 2015	GROUTEAM PTE LTD (Defendant): Adjudication Determination Set AsideThe Adjudication Determination in favor of the Defendant was set aside.
3	Associate Dynamic Builder v Tactic Foundation: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination under Security of Payment Act 04 Jun 2013 Associate Dynamic Builder Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	04 Jun 2013	Associate Dynamic Builder Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application DismissedApplication to set aside the adjudication determination dismissed.
4	Shin Khai Construction v FL Wong Construction: Adjudication Determination & Security of Payment Act 27 Jan 2013 Shin Khai Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	27 Jan 2013	Shin Khai Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application DismissedApplication to set aside the Determination dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
5	Garden Hub v Attorney-General: Relief Against Forfeiture & State Tenancy Termination 30 Jan 2012 Garden Hub Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	30 Jan 2012	Garden Hub Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Statement of claim struck out in partThe plaintiff's statement of claim was struck out in part, specifically the claims related to breach of contract and rectification, but the claims related to relief against forfeiture and the validity of the termination notice were allowed to proceed.
6	Surface Stone v Tay Seng Leon: Discovery of Electronic Documents & Train of Inquiry 04 Oct 2011 Second defendant (Defendant)Neutral	04 Oct 2011	Second defendant (Defendant): NeutralThe second defendant was not directly involved in the present application.