R Kalamohan

R Kalamohan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fiduciary duties and criminal law. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 13% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

R Kalamohan has demonstrated expertise across 33 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and fiduciary duties.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	R Kalamohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	R Kalamohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	R Kalamohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	R Kalamohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	R Kalamohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	R Kalamohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	R Kalamohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	R Kalamohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	R Kalamohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	R Kalamohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	R Kalamohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	R Kalamohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	R Kalamohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	R Kalamohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	R Kalamohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	R Kalamohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	R Kalamohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
House-trespass	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	R Kalamohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	R Kalamohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	R Kalamohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	R Kalamohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	R Kalamohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Workplace accident	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	R Kalamohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of duty of fidelity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	R Kalamohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Account of Profits	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	R Kalamohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Competition	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	R Kalamohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	R Kalamohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	R Kalamohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	R Kalamohan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	R Kalamohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	R Kalamohan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	R Kalamohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	R Kalamohan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

R Kalamohan has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Kalamohan & Co	6 cases	75% of cases	Mona Computer Systems v Singaravelu Murugan: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Account of Profits(Mar 2014) Mona Computer Systems v Singaravelu: Account of Profits for Breach of Fiduciary Duty(Nov 2013) Mona Computer Systems v Chandran Meenakumari: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Diversion of Business Opportunities(Nov 2012)
R Kalamohan Law LLC	1 cases	13% of cases	Thangarajan Elanchezhian v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Outrage of Modesty(Dec 2024)
Kalamohan and Co	1 cases	13% of cases	Naidu Rajasimha v Naidu Sathyamurthi: Resulting Trusts & Beneficial Ownership Dispute(Jun 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of R Kalamohan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 1 (13%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Partial	42.5 parties avg	2.5	50%
Won	24.5 parties avg	4.5	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of R Kalamohan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(25%)	25%
Partial	4(50%)	50%
Won	2(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	364,190.37	72,838.075 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2013	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Thangarajan Elanchezhian v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Outrage of Modesty 02 Dec 2024 Thangarajan Elanchezhian (Appellant)Lost	02 Dec 2024	Thangarajan Elanchezhian (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe Appellant's appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed.
2	Mona Computer Systems v Singaravelu Murugan: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Account of Profits 19 Mar 2014 Mona Computer Systems (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	19 Mar 2014	Mona Computer Systems (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal dismissed in part and allowed in partAppeal dismissed regarding director's fees but allowed in part regarding interest on the judgment debt (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Mona Computer Systems v Singaravelu: Account of Profits for Breach of Fiduciary Duty 26 Nov 2013 Mona Computer Systems (S) Pte Ltd (Appellant)Partial	26 Nov 2013	Mona Computer Systems (S) Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part, restoring the decision of the Assistant Registrar that the $316,065.37 received by the Respondent from MN as commissions be accounted to the Appellant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Mona Computer Systems v Chandran Meenakumari: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Diversion of Business Opportunities 15 Nov 2012 Mona Computer Systems (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	15 Nov 2012	Mona Computer Systems (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partMurugan to account for director's fees of $48,125 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Manickam Sankar v Selvaraj Madhavan: Workplace Safety, Negligence & Occupier's Liability 07 May 2012 Manickam Sankar (Plaintiff)Won	07 May 2012	Manickam Sankar (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff; damages to be assessed by the Registrar. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Mona Computer Systems v Chandran Meenakumari: Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Diversion of Business Opportunities 15 Sep 2010 Mona Computer Systems (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	15 Sep 2010	Mona Computer Systems (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim Allowed in PartPlaintiff's claim against D2 for breach of fiduciary duty was successful. Plaintiff's claim against D1 was dismissed.
7	Naidu Rajasimha v Naidu Sathyamurthi: Resulting Trusts & Beneficial Ownership Dispute 09 Jun 2004 Arumugam Mangalagowri (Defendant)Won	09 Jun 2004	Arumugam Mangalagowri (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for Defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	PP v Tsao Kok Wah: Enhanced Punishment for Attempted House-breaking by Night under s 458A Penal Code 07 Feb 2001 Tsao Kok Wah (Respondent)Lost	07 Feb 2001	Tsao Kok Wah (Respondent): Additional sentence of caning imposedAn additional sentence of caning of six strokes was imposed on the respondent.