R Chandran

R Chandran is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trademarks and passing off. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 40% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

R Chandran has demonstrated expertise across 25 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	R Chandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	R Chandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	R Chandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	R Chandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	R Chandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	R Chandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	R Chandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	R Chandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	R Chandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	R Chandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	R Chandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	R Chandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	R Chandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	R Chandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	R Chandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	R Chandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	R Chandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty of fidelity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	R Chandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Arrangement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	R Chandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	R Chandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	R Chandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	R Chandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conveyance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	R Chandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	R Chandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	R Chandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

R Chandran has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
R Chandran & Co	4 cases	80% of cases	Trident Pharm v Yong Pei Pei Tracey: Breach of Fidelity & Conspiracy in Pharmacy Lease Tender(Apr 2014) Teo Cha Sau v Ong Lay Loon: Family Arrangement, Loan Repayment & Beneficial Ownership Dispute(Sep 2010) Kickapoo v Monarch: Trade Mark Infringement & Passing Off Dispute(Dec 2009)
Leo Fernando & Co	1 cases	20% of cases	Monarch Beverage v Kickapoo: Trademark Infringement, Passing Off & Conspiracy(Mar 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of R Chandran's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.9
Complex Cases: 2 (40%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	17.0 parties avg	7.0	20%
Lost	25.0 parties avg	5.0	40%
Won	22.7 parties avg	2.7	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2010	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of R Chandran's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(20%)	20%
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Trident Pharm v Yong Pei Pei Tracey: Breach of Fidelity & Conspiracy in Pharmacy Lease Tender 02 Apr 2014 Husband of Yong Pei Pei Tracey (Defendant)Won	02 Apr 2014	Husband of Yong Pei Pei Tracey (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; the plaintiff's claims were dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Teo Cha Sau v Ong Lay Loon: Family Arrangement, Loan Repayment & Beneficial Ownership Dispute 15 Sep 2010 CKT Thomas Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff)Dismissed	15 Sep 2010	CKT Thomas Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim by CKT dismissed.
3	Kickapoo v Monarch: Trade Mark Infringement & Passing Off Dispute 10 Dec 2009 Kickapoo Beverage Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	10 Dec 2009	Kickapoo Beverage Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Monarch Beverage v Kickapoo: Trademark Infringement, Passing Off & Conspiracy 05 Mar 2009 Kickapoo Beverage Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	05 Mar 2009	Kickapoo Beverage Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for Defendant on trademark infringement and passing offJudgment against the Defendant on the claims of trademark infringement and passing off. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Focus Electronics v Touch Universal: Validity of Sale Agreement & Caveat 23 Aug 2000 Touch Universal Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	23 Aug 2000	Touch Universal Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant, Touch Universal Pte Ltd. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.