Quek Yi Liang Daniel

Quek Yi Liang Daniel is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and trademarks. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Quek Yi Liang Daniel has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Quek Yi Liang Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Quek Yi Liang Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Quek Yi Liang Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Quek Yi Liang Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Quek Yi Liang Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Quek Yi Liang Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Quek Yi Liang Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Quek Yi Liang Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Quek Yi Liang Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Quek Yi Liang Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Quek Yi Liang Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Taxation of Legal Fees	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Quek Yi Liang Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Quek Yi Liang Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Quek Yi Liang Daniel has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	3 cases	100% of cases	Yitai v Charlotte Pipe: Trade Mark Dispute - Adducing Further Evidence on Appeal(Aug 2021) Gabriel Law Corp v H&C S Holdings: Taxation of Costs in Arbitration Enforcement(Nov 2020) Chan Boon Siang v Jasmin Nisban: Striking Out Libel Claim for Extraordinary General Meeting Requisition(Oct 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Quek Yi Liang Daniel's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 9.7
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	125.0 parties avg	25.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	125.0 parties avg	25.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Quek Yi Liang Daniel's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Yitai v Charlotte Pipe: Trade Mark Dispute - Adducing Further Evidence on Appeal 23 Aug 2021 Yitai (Shanghai) Plastic Co., Ltd. (Applicant, Appellant)Lost	23 Aug 2021	Yitai (Shanghai) Plastic Co., Ltd. (Applicant, Appellant): Application dismissedApplication to adduce further evidence on appeal was dismissed.
2	Gabriel Law Corp v H&C S Holdings: Taxation of Costs in Arbitration Enforcement 05 Nov 2020 H&C S Holdings Pte Ltd (Respondent)Partial	05 Nov 2020	H&C S Holdings Pte Ltd (Respondent): Review application allowed in partClient's review application allowed in part; professional fees reduced, costs of taxation awarded to client, and disbursements reduced.
3	Chan Boon Siang v Jasmin Nisban: Striking Out Libel Claim for Extraordinary General Meeting Requisition 08 Oct 2017 Jasmin Nisban (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	08 Oct 2017	Jasmin Nisban (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, restoring the action. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.