Quek Jie Ying

Quek Jie Ying is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trademarks and patents. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Quek Jie Ying has demonstrated expertise across 7 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and trademarks.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	30% of total caseload	General Practice13% relevance score	Quek Jie Ying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 30% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	2 cases	20% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Quek Jie Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.
Patents	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Quek Jie Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Quek Jie Ying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Quek Jie Ying has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Quek Jie Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Trademark Infringement	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Quek Jie Ying has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Quek Jie Ying has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	2 cases	67% of cases	Global Tobacco v Jamal: Trade Mark Invalidity for Cigarette Products(Sep 2015) Al Mahamid v Global Tobacco: Trade Mark Invalidation for Cigarette Brand 'Manchester'(Feb 2015)
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	ASM Technology v Towa Corporation: Patent Infringement & Modularity(Jan 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Quek Jie Ying's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Quek Jie Ying's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	85,000.00	28,333.333 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	ASM Technology v Towa Corporation: Patent Infringement & Modularity 04 Jan 2018 TOWA Corporation (Respondent)Won	04 Jan 2018	TOWA Corporation (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $85,000 (inclusive of disbursements) to be paid by the Appellant to the Respondent. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Global Tobacco v Jamal: Trade Mark Invalidity for Cigarette Products 28 Sep 2015 Jamal Abdulnaser Mahmoud Al Mahamid (Respondent)Won	28 Sep 2015	Jamal Abdulnaser Mahmoud Al Mahamid (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favour of the respondent; costs of the appeal and proceedings below to be taxed if not agreed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Al Mahamid v Global Tobacco: Trade Mark Invalidation for Cigarette Brand 'Manchester' 10 Feb 2015 Jamal Abdulnaser Mahmoud Al Mahamid (Plaintiff)Won	10 Feb 2015	Jamal Abdulnaser Mahmoud Al Mahamid (Plaintiff): Trade Mark Invalidation GrantedTrade Mark No. T1208253B for “Manchester and M device” registered in Class 34 in the name of the Defendant is declared invalid under s 23(3)(a)(i) read with s 8(2)(b) of the Act. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.