Peter Chean

Peter Chean is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2006. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in administrative law and disciplinary proceedings. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Peter Chean has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and medical law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Peter Chean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Medical Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Peter Chean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Peter Chean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Peter Chean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Peter Chean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Peter Chean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Peter Chean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Illegality	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Peter Chean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Peter Chean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Peter Chean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Peter Chean has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Peter Chean has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Privity of contract	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Peter Chean has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Peter Chean has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Harry Elias Partnership	2 cases	100% of cases	Lee Chee Wei v Tan Hor Peow Victor: Specific Performance & Illegality in Share Sale Contract(Jul 2006) Lim Teng Ee Joyce v Singapore Medical Council: Appeal Against Costs Order in Disciplinary Proceedings(Jul 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Peter Chean's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	15.0 parties avg	5.0	50%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Peter Chean's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Partial	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lee Chee Wei v Tan Hor Peow Victor: Specific Performance & Illegality in Share Sale Contract 11 Jul 2006 Lee Chee Wei (Plaintiff)Lost	11 Jul 2006	Lee Chee Wei (Plaintiff): Claim for specific performance or payment of the balance purchase price is disallowedThe plaintiff's claim for specific performance or payment of the balance purchase price is disallowed.
2	Lim Teng Ee Joyce v Singapore Medical Council: Appeal Against Costs Order in Disciplinary Proceedings 18 Jul 2005 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Partial	18 Jul 2005	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Costs order reducedCosts order reduced to one-third of the original amount (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).