Patrick Yeo Kim Hai

Patrick Yeo Kim Hai is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in wrongful death and third parties (rights against insurers) act. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Patrick Yeo Kim Hai has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in automobile accidents and personal injury.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Automobile Accidents	3 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Patrick Yeo Kim Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	3 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Patrick Yeo Kim Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Patrick Yeo Kim Hai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Patrick Yeo Kim Hai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Patrick Yeo Kim Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Patrick Yeo Kim Hai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Patrick Yeo Kim Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Patrick Yeo Kim Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Policy Defences	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Patrick Yeo Kim Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Patrick Yeo Kim Hai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Patrick Yeo Kim Hai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Patrick Yeo Kim Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Patrick Yeo Kim Hai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Dependency Claim	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Patrick Yeo Kim Hai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Rectification Works	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Patrick Yeo Kim Hai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contractors’ All Risk Policy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Patrick Yeo Kim Hai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Patrick Yeo Kim Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Patrick Yeo Kim Hai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Patrick Yeo Kim Hai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Patrick Yeo Kim Hai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Patrick Yeo Kim Hai has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
KhattarWong LLP	2 cases	50% of cases	Sulastri Bte Achmad v Tan Hee Hang: Dependency Claim & Damages for Fatal Road Accident(Feb 2017) Fong Khim Ling v Tan Teck Ann: Appeal Threshold under Supreme Court of Judicature Act(Feb 2014)
Khattar Wong & Partners	2 cases	50% of cases	Guo Xinhua v Lee Chin Ngee: Dependency Claim for Fatal Road Accident(Jul 2001) Chiu Teng Construction v Hartford Insurance: Third Parties Act & Insurer Liability(May 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Patrick Yeo Kim Hai's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Partial	24.0 parties avg	4.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Patrick Yeo Kim Hai's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Partial	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	491,975.08	163,991.693 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sulastri Bte Achmad v Tan Hee Hang: Dependency Claim & Damages for Fatal Road Accident 06 Feb 2017 Kendo Trading Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	06 Feb 2017	Kendo Trading Pte Ltd (Defendant): Partial LossInterlocutory judgment was entered against the defendants for 95% of the damages assessed as due to the Estate and to Mdm Sulastri for her dependency claim. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Fong Khim Ling v Tan Teck Ann: Appeal Threshold under Supreme Court of Judicature Act 09 Feb 2014 Tan Teck Ann (Respondent)Lost	09 Feb 2014	Tan Teck Ann (Respondent): Application DismissedThe respondent's application to strike out the appeal was dismissed.
3	Guo Xinhua v Lee Chin Ngee: Dependency Claim for Fatal Road Accident 18 Jul 2001 First Capital Insurance Limited (Defendant)Partial	18 Jul 2001	First Capital Insurance Limited (Defendant): Appeal dismissed in partLoss of CPF contribution (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Chiu Teng Construction v Hartford Insurance: Third Parties Act & Insurer Liability 29 May 2001 The Hartford Insurance Company (Singapore) Ltd (formerly known as The People's Insurance Co Ltd) (Defendant)Lost	29 May 2001	The Hartford Insurance Company (Singapore) Ltd (formerly known as The People's Insurance Co Ltd) (Defendant): Judgment Against DefendantJudgment against the defendant in the amount of $446,600.08, plus interest at 6% per annum from 2000-05-30, and costs of $5,500 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).