Pang Ru Xue

Pang Ru Xue is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in statutory interpretation and protection from online falsehoods and manipulation act (pofma). Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Pang Ru Xue has demonstrated expertise across 7 primary practice areas, with significant experience in statutory interpretation and constitutional law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	20% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Pang Ru Xue has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	2 cases	20% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Pang Ru Xue has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.
Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA)	2 cases	20% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Pang Ru Xue has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pang Ru Xue has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Pang Ru Xue has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Pang Ru Xue has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Freedom of speech	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Pang Ru Xue has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Pang Ru Xue has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	2 cases	100% of cases	Singapore Democratic Party v Attorney-General: POFMA, Statutory Interpretation & Online Falsehoods(May 2022) The Online Citizen v Attorney-General: POFMA, Freedom of Speech & Constitutional Law(Oct 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Pang Ru Xue's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Pang Ru Xue's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	7,000.00	7,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Singapore Democratic Party v Attorney-General: POFMA, Statutory Interpretation & Online Falsehoods 09 May 2022 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	09 May 2022	Attorney-General (Respondent): Costs AwardedThe Attorney-General was awarded costs of $7,000 and reasonable disbursements to be fixed by the court if not agreed between the parties, to be paid by the Singapore Democratic Party. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	The Online Citizen v Attorney-General: POFMA, Freedom of Speech & Constitutional Law 07 Oct 2021 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	07 Oct 2021	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe court dismissed the appeal.