Nur Rafizah Binte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor

Nur Rafizah Binte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and injunctions. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Nur Rafizah Binte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and commercial disputes.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nur Rafizah Binte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Nur Rafizah Binte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nur Rafizah Binte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nur Rafizah Binte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nur Rafizah Binte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Nur Rafizah Binte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nur Rafizah Binte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nur Rafizah Binte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Distributorship Agreement	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nur Rafizah Binte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Dishonoured Cheques	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Nur Rafizah Binte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nur Rafizah Binte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nur Rafizah Binte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Nur Rafizah Binte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Selvam LLC	1 cases	50% of cases	Piallo GmbH v Yafriro International: Stay of Proceedings & International Arbitration Act(Nov 2013)
Joseph Tan Jude Benny LLP	1 cases	50% of cases	Jonathan John Shipping v Continental Shipping: Mareva Injunction & Asset Dissipation(Feb 2025)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Nur Rafizah Binte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2025	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Nur Rafizah Binte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	52,305.00	26,152.502 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2025	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Jonathan John Shipping v Continental Shipping: Mareva Injunction & Asset Dissipation 25 Feb 2025 Jonathan John Shipping Ltd (Claimant)Won	25 Feb 2025	Jonathan John Shipping Ltd (Claimant): Application GrantedClaimant's application for disclosure orders and variation of the Mareva Order was granted with modifications. Costs fixed at $20,000 for SUM 995 and $25,805 for SUM 391, to be paid by the Defendant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Piallo GmbH v Yafriro International: Stay of Proceedings & International Arbitration Act 25 Nov 2013 Piallo GmbH (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	25 Nov 2013	Piallo GmbH (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs fixed at S$6,500. Piallo was granted liberty to apply to lift the stay of proceedings after the arbitral tribunal ruled on its own jurisdiction. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.