Nicholas Winarta Chandra

Nicholas Winarta Chandra is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and damages.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Nicholas Winarta Chandra has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and construction law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nicholas Winarta Chandra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nicholas Winarta Chandra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Nicholas Winarta Chandra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nicholas Winarta Chandra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nicholas Winarta Chandra has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nicholas Winarta Chandra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Related Contracts	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nicholas Winarta Chandra has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contractual Duties	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nicholas Winarta Chandra has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Nicholas Winarta Chandra has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Parwani Law LLC	1 cases	100% of cases	Smile Inc v OP3 International: Defective Construction & Flooding at Suntec City Clinic(Oct 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Nicholas Winarta Chandra's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Nicholas Winarta Chandra's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	87,432.50	87,432.501 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Smile Inc v OP3 International: Defective Construction & Flooding at Suntec City Clinic 04 Oct 2017 OP3 International Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	04 Oct 2017	OP3 International Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim Allowed in PartCounterclaim allowed in part for $87,432.50, to be set off against the damages assessed to be due to the plaintiff.