Ng Weiting

Ng Weiting is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in bankruptcy and commercial fraud.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ng Weiting has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ng Weiting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ng Weiting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ng Weiting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ng Weiting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ng Weiting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ng Weiting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ng Weiting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ng Weiting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transfer	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ng Weiting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ng Weiting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ng Weiting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ng Weiting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ng Weiting has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ang & Partners	1 cases	50% of cases	DBS Bank v Yamazaki Mazak: Discovery & Particulars Dispute on Loan Default & Misrepresentation(Jul 2010)
Ang and Partners	1 cases	50% of cases	Larsen Oil and Gas v Petroprod: Arbitration vs. Insolvency – Enforceability of Arbitration Clause in Liquidation(May 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ng Weiting's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ng Weiting's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Neutral	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Larsen Oil and Gas v Petroprod: Arbitration vs. Insolvency – Enforceability of Arbitration Clause in Liquidation 10 May 2011 Larsen Oil and Gas Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	10 May 2011	Larsen Oil and Gas Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
2	DBS Bank v Yamazaki Mazak: Discovery & Particulars Dispute on Loan Default & Misrepresentation 20 Jul 2010 Hwa Lai Heng Ricky (Defendant)Neutral	20 Jul 2010	Hwa Lai Heng Ricky (Defendant): No specific outcome mentioned for this party in this judgment extract.No specific outcome mentioned for this party in this judgment extract.