Nathan Shashidran

Nathan Shashidran is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal procedure and culpable homicide.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Nathan Shashidran has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	4 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Nathan Shashidran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nathan Shashidran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nathan Shashidran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nathan Shashidran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nathan Shashidran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nathan Shashidran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nathan Shashidran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Framework	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nathan Shashidran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nathan Shashidran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Nathan Shashidran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Young Offenders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nathan Shashidran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nathan Shashidran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nathan Shashidran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nathan Shashidran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nathan Shashidran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent Trading	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Nathan Shashidran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mentally disordered offenders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nathan Shashidran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Nathan Shashidran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mitigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nathan Shashidran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Nathan Shashidran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nathan Shashidran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nathan Shashidran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Nathan Shashidran has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Withers KhattarWong LLP	4 cases	80% of cases	Attorney-General v Jill Phua: Disciplinary Proceedings & Duty of Candour in Legal Profession Act(Aug 2024) How Soo Feng v Public Prosecutor: Fraudulent Trading under Companies Act(Sep 2023) Ahmad Danial v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against DNATA for Murder Charge(Apr 2023)
Harry Elias Partnership	1 cases	20% of cases	PP v Aguilar Guen Garlejo: Culpable Homicide, Mental Disorder, and Sentencing(May 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Nathan Shashidran's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	52.5 parties avg	2.5	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Nathan Shashidran's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Attorney-General v Jill Phua: Disciplinary Proceedings & Duty of Candour in Legal Profession Act 19 Aug 2024 Jill Phua (Respondent)Lost	19 Aug 2024	Jill Phua (Respondent): Struck off the RollRespondent was struck off the Roll and imposed a minimum reinstatement interval of two years and six months (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	How Soo Feng v Public Prosecutor: Fraudulent Trading under Companies Act 07 Sep 2023 Iseli Rudolf James Maitland (Appellant)Lost	07 Sep 2023	Iseli Rudolf James Maitland (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
3	Ahmad Danial v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against DNATA for Murder Charge 12 Apr 2023 Ahmad Danial Bin Mohamed Rafa’ee (Appellant)Lost	12 Apr 2023	Ahmad Danial Bin Mohamed Rafa’ee (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the district judge's decision to grant a discharge not amounting to an acquittal was dismissed.
4	Public Prosecutor v CNJ: Sentencing for Culpable Homicide by Young Offender 23 Jan 2022 CNJ (Defendant)Lost	23 Jan 2022	CNJ (Defendant): Sentence of five years’ detention imposedThe accused was sentenced to five years’ detention.
5	PP v Aguilar Guen Garlejo: Culpable Homicide, Mental Disorder, and Sentencing 28 May 2006 Aguilar Guen Garlejo (Defendant)Lost	28 May 2006	Aguilar Guen Garlejo (Defendant): LostThe accused was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of ten years.