Natalie Ng Hai Qi

Natalie Ng Hai Qi is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fraud and deceit and conspiracy by unlawful means. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Natalie Ng Hai Qi has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in banking and finance and real estate.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Banking and Finance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Natalie Ng Hai Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Natalie Ng Hai Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Natalie Ng Hai Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Natalie Ng Hai Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Natalie Ng Hai Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Natalie Ng Hai Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Natalie Ng Hai Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Natalie Ng Hai Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Natalie Ng Hai Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Natalie Ng Hai Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Natalie Ng Hai Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Natalie Ng Hai Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Without Prejudice Privilege	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Natalie Ng Hai Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Waiver of Privilege	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Natalie Ng Hai Qi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Muller Exception	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Natalie Ng Hai Qi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Inconsistent positions	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Natalie Ng Hai Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Non approbation and reprobation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Natalie Ng Hai Qi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Natalie Ng Hai Qi has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	2 cases	100% of cases	Leong Quee Ching Karen v Lim Soon Huat: Without Prejudice Privilege & Minority Oppression(Aug 2023) UOB v Lippo Marina: Unlawful Means Conspiracy & Deceit in Property Sale(Oct 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Natalie Ng Hai Qi's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.5
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	25.5 parties avg	5.5	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Natalie Ng Hai Qi's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	49,000.00	49,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Leong Quee Ching Karen v Lim Soon Huat: Without Prejudice Privilege & Minority Oppression 22 Aug 2023 Leong Quee Ching Karen (Claimant)Partial	22 Aug 2023	Leong Quee Ching Karen (Claimant): Application allowed in partClaimant's application to strike out emails allowed in part; emails ordered to be expunged from affidavits, except for one email.
2	UOB v Lippo Marina: Unlawful Means Conspiracy & Deceit in Property Sale 27 Oct 2022 United Overseas Bank Limited (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	27 Oct 2022	United Overseas Bank Limited (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; Lippo is liable to pay damages to UOB, the quantum of which will be determined at the assessment of damages. UOB awarded 70% of the costs of the appeal which we assess to be $70,000. 70% of that is $49,000. This does not include disbursements of the appeal for which UOB claims $45,256.04 because of voluminous documents. However, a substantial part of the documents was not necessary for CA 67 as they were repeat documents which were common to the purchasers. UOB should have sought directions whether they could have used sample documents instead. In the circumstances, this court awards UOB $10,000 for disbursements of the appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.