Nanthini Vijayakumar

Nanthini Vijayakumar is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in illegality and public policy and unjust enrichment. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Nanthini Vijayakumar has demonstrated expertise across 30 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nanthini Vijayakumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Nanthini Vijayakumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Nanthini Vijayakumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Nanthini Vijayakumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nanthini Vijayakumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nanthini Vijayakumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Nanthini Vijayakumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Nanthini Vijayakumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nanthini Vijayakumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Nanthini Vijayakumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nanthini Vijayakumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Nanthini Vijayakumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nanthini Vijayakumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nanthini Vijayakumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nanthini Vijayakumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nanthini Vijayakumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Trade	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nanthini Vijayakumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Nanthini Vijayakumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nanthini Vijayakumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Nanthini Vijayakumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Nanthini Vijayakumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Quistclose trust	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Nanthini Vijayakumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Confidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nanthini Vijayakumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Failure of Basis	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Nanthini Vijayakumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreements	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Nanthini Vijayakumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Nanthini Vijayakumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nanthini Vijayakumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nanthini Vijayakumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Interrogatories	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Nanthini Vijayakumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Nanthini Vijayakumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Nanthini Vijayakumar has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
TSMP Law Corporation	4 cases	100% of cases	Prudential Assurance v Peter Tan: Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty & Restraint of Trade in Mass Agent Departure(May 2021) HE & SF Properties LP v Rising Dragon: Quistclose Trust, Unjust Enrichment, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Conspiracy(May 2019) BTY v BUA: Stay of Litigation & Arbitration Agreement Scope(Oct 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Nanthini Vijayakumar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%
Partial	22.7 parties avg	2.7	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Nanthini Vijayakumar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Partial	2(50%)	50%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Prudential Assurance v Peter Tan: Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty & Restraint of Trade in Mass Agent Departure 04 May 2021 Peter Tan Shou Yi (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim)Lost	04 May 2021	Peter Tan Shou Yi (Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim): Counterclaim DismissedAll counterclaims dismissed.
2	HE & SF Properties LP v Rising Dragon: Quistclose Trust, Unjust Enrichment, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Conspiracy 02 May 2019 Eric Alfred Schaer (Defendant)Partial	02 May 2019	Eric Alfred Schaer (Defendant): Judgment for Plaintiff in part; Judgment for Defendant in partJudgment for Plaintiff against Mr. Eric Alfred Schaer for fraudulent misrepresentation regarding the MySQUAR moneys. Judgment for Defendant in part. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	BTY v BUA: Stay of Litigation & Arbitration Agreement Scope 14 Oct 2018 BTY (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	14 Oct 2018	BTY (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal against the stay of litigation was allowed. The court ordered the Company to pay the plaintiff’s costs fixed at $18,000 including disbursements and costs of the sealing application fixed at $500 including disbursements. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Prudential Assurance v Tan Shou Yi Peter: Interrogatories & Authenticity of Audio Recordings 11 Apr 2018 Tan Shou Yi Peter (Defendant, Applicant)Partial	11 Apr 2018	Tan Shou Yi Peter (Defendant, Applicant): Application dismissed in partThe court ordered the withdrawal of the Secondary Queries and the Final Interrogatory, but declined to order the withdrawal of the Primary Queries.