Mimi Oh

Mimi Oh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 13 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and damages. Their track record shows a 8.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 8% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Mimi Oh has demonstrated expertise across 71 primary practice areas, with significant experience in commercial disputes and family law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Family Law	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Income taxation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Customs Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Grossly Improper Conduct	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Show cause action	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loan Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ancillary powers of court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remoteness	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Solicitors' Accounts Rules	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Directors' Liabilities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Financial relief after foreign divorce	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Authority	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Detention	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Industry	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loss of Amenities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pain and Suffering	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Provisional Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Goods and Services Tax	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Condition	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Formation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Spousal Support	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Care and Control	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Mimi Oh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Mimi Oh has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Mimi Oh & Associates	6 cases	46% of cases	Yenty Lily v ACES System: Breach of Contract, Wrongful Detention & Damages Assessment(Oct 2012) BCB v BCC: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Custody Dispute in Divorce(Jul 2012) Tan Juay Mui v Sher Kuan Hock: Personal Injury, Negligence, and Assessment of Damages(May 2012)
Mimi Oh and Associates	4 cases	31% of cases	Law Society of Singapore v Chiong Chin May Selena: Show Cause Action for Solicitor's Misconduct(Aug 2005) Ong Beng Leong v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Reference Application & Extension of Time(Feb 2005) Ong Beng Leong v Public Prosecutor: Prevention of Corruption Act & Use of False Documents(Jan 2005)
Ethos Law Corporation	1 cases	8% of cases	UFM v UFN: Financial Relief After Foreign Divorce & Interpretation of Women's Charter Chapter 4A(Sep 2017)
RHT Law Taylor Wessing LLP	1 cases	8% of cases	BCB v BCC: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Custody Dispute under Women's Charter(Jan 2013)
RHTLaw Taylor Wessing LLP	1 cases	8% of cases	Law Society v Chiong Chin May Selena: Disciplinary Action for Negligence in Divorce Proceedings(Jan 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mimi Oh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 1 (8%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	62.4 parties avg	2.4	46%
Partial	62.6 parties avg	2.6	46%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	8%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2012	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2013	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mimi Oh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(46%)	46%
Partial	6(46%)	46%
Won	1(8%)	8%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	75,507.10	10,786.737 cases	7

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2013	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 13 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	UFM v UFN: Financial Relief After Foreign Divorce & Interpretation of Women's Charter Chapter 4A 21 Sep 2017 UFN (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	21 Sep 2017	UFN (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed.
2	BCB v BCC: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Custody Dispute under Women's Charter 27 Jan 2013 BCC (Respondent)Partial	27 Jan 2013	BCC (Respondent): Appeal denied in partAppeal dismissed with regard to the issue relating to care and control of the children, and allowed with regard to the issue relating to the division of matrimonial assets. The net sale proceeds from the Properties be divided in the proportion of 40% to the Husband and 60% to the Wife instead. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Law Society v Chiong Chin May Selena: Disciplinary Action for Negligence in Divorce Proceedings 14 Jan 2013 Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Partial	14 Jan 2013	Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Partial SuccessThe court partially upheld the charges against the respondent.
4	Yenty Lily v ACES System: Breach of Contract, Wrongful Detention & Damages Assessment 17 Oct 2012 ACES System Development Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	17 Oct 2012	ACES System Development Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; required to pay the plaintiff's costs of the appeal.
5	BCB v BCC: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Custody Dispute in Divorce 16 Jul 2012 BCC (Defendant)Partial	16 Jul 2012	BCC (Defendant): Orders made pertaining to custody, care and control of the three children, maintenance for the three children and the Wife, and division of matrimonial assets.Orders made pertaining to custody, care and control of the three children, maintenance for the three children and the Wife, and division of matrimonial assets. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Tan Juay Mui v Sher Kuan Hock: Personal Injury, Negligence, and Assessment of Damages 07 May 2012 Liberty Insurance Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	07 May 2012	Liberty Insurance Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
7	Ho Soo Fong v Ng Chuan Hwa: Loan Recovery & Guarantee Dispute in Construction Projects 13 Jun 2010 Ho Soo Fong (Appellant)Partial	13 Jun 2010	Ho Soo Fong (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartThe Company is to pay the appellant a sum of $75,507.10 together with interest at 5.33% per annum from the date of the writ to the date of this judgment. The second respondent is liable for the debt of the Company up to a sum of $47,100 together with interest at 5.33% per annum from the date of the writ to the date of this judgment. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Viking Airtech v Foo Teow Keng: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Damages Assessment 22 Jul 2009 JL Marine & Engineering Pte Ltd (formerly known as Viking HVAC & Automation Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Partial	22 Jul 2009	JL Marine & Engineering Pte Ltd (formerly known as Viking HVAC & Automation Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal failed in partAppeal failed in part; damages for diverted contracts upheld, but damages for the Pelindo II contract were reduced (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Viking Airtech v Foo Teow Keng: Director's Fiduciary Duty & Business Diversion 11 Oct 2007 JL Marine & Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	11 Oct 2007	JL Marine & Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant): Damages to be assessedDamages to be assessed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Law Society of Singapore v Chiong Chin May Selena: Show Cause Action for Solicitor's Misconduct 17 Aug 2005 Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	17 Aug 2005	Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Show cause action successfulThe Law Society successfully showed cause for disciplinary action against the respondent.
11	Ong Beng Leong v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Reference Application & Extension of Time 21 Feb 2005 Ong Beng Leong (Applicant)Lost	21 Feb 2005	Ong Beng Leong (Applicant): Motion dismissedApplication for stay of sentence and extension of time to file criminal reference was dismissed.
12	Ong Beng Leong v Public Prosecutor: Prevention of Corruption Act & Use of False Documents 31 Jan 2005 Ong Beng Leong (Appellant)Lost	31 Jan 2005	Ong Beng Leong (Appellant): Appeal against conviction dismissedThe appellant's appeal against his conviction was dismissed.
13	Chew Gim Ser v PP: Customs Act Violation & Appeal on Importing Cigarettes 04 Nov 2004 Chew Gim Ser (Appellant)Partial	04 Nov 2004	Chew Gim Ser (Appellant): Appeal on sentence allowed; appeal against conviction on the third and fourth charges dismissed.Appeal on sentence allowed, reducing the overall imprisonment term and adding a fine. Appeal against conviction on the third and fourth charges dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.