Marcus Yip

Marcus Yip is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2008. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in misrepresentation and civil practice. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 60% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Marcus Yip has demonstrated expertise across 34 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Marcus Yip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Marcus Yip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Marcus Yip has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Marcus Yip has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Marcus Yip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Marcus Yip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Telecommunications Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Marcus Yip has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Marcus Yip has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Marcus Yip has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Marcus Yip has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Marcus Yip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Marcus Yip has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Marcus Yip has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Marcus Yip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penalties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Marcus Yip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Marcus Yip has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Change of position	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Marcus Yip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Marcus Yip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Service of document out of jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Marcus Yip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Marcus Yip has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Marcus Yip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Marcus Yip has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Marcus Yip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Loss of Chance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Marcus Yip has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mitigation of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Marcus Yip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mistake of Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Marcus Yip has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Company	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Marcus Yip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Salesmen’s puff	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Marcus Yip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Compromise	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Marcus Yip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Marcus Yip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assumption of Risk	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Marcus Yip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Marcus Yip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Marcus Yip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Marcus Yip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Marcus Yip has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill	3 cases	60% of cases	Tan Chin Seng v Raffles Town Club: Misrepresentation & Breach of Contract in Club Membership(Nov 2002) IDA v SingTel: Restitution for Mistake of Law in Telecom License Modification Compensation(May 2002) Kim Hok Yung v Rabobank: Striking Out Claim for Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Employment Contract(Jul 2000)
Shook Lin & Bok LLP	1 cases	20% of cases	Petroval SA v Stainby Overseas Ltd: Mareva Injunctions & Court Jurisdiction in Cross-Border Fraud(May 2008)
Shook Lin & Bok	1 cases	20% of cases	Justlogin v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp: Damages Assessment for Loss of Chance in iProp Asset Sale(Nov 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Marcus Yip's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.8
Complex Cases: 3 (60%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	26.3 parties avg	6.3	40%
Won	35.3 parties avg	5.3	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2002	26.5 parties avg	6.5
2006	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2008	111.0 parties avg	11.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Marcus Yip's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,060,000.00	765,000.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Petroval SA v Stainby Overseas Ltd: Mareva Injunctions & Court Jurisdiction in Cross-Border Fraud 01 May 2008 Petroval SA (Plaintiff)Lost	01 May 2008	Petroval SA (Plaintiff): Interlocutory relief set asideThe court set aside the interlocutory relief sought by the plaintiff.
2	Justlogin v Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp: Damages Assessment for Loss of Chance in iProp Asset Sale 19 Nov 2006 Bank of Singapore Limited (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	19 Nov 2006	Bank of Singapore Limited (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; required to pay $1.53 million in damages (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Tan Chin Seng v Raffles Town Club: Misrepresentation & Breach of Contract in Club Membership 21 Nov 2002 Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	21 Nov 2002	Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantClaims for misrepresentation and breach of contract dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	IDA v SingTel: Restitution for Mistake of Law in Telecom License Modification Compensation 29 May 2002 Singapore Telecommunications Ltd (Defendant)Won	29 May 2002	Singapore Telecommunications Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
5	Kim Hok Yung v Rabobank: Striking Out Claim for Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Employment Contract 07 Jul 2000 Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank BA (trading as Rabobank) (Defendant, Appellant)Won	07 Jul 2000	Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank BA (trading as Rabobank) (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; plaintiffs' claims struck out. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.