Manvindar Kaur Sethi d/o Sarwan Sing

Manvindar Kaur Sethi d/o Sarwan Sing is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2023 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in guarantee and summary judgement.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Manvindar Kaur Sethi d/o Sarwan Sing has demonstrated expertise across 7 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and banking and finance.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	1 cases	14% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Manvindar Kaur Sethi d/o Sarwan Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	14% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Manvindar Kaur Sethi d/o Sarwan Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	14% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Manvindar Kaur Sethi d/o Sarwan Sing has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Manvindar Kaur Sethi d/o Sarwan Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Manvindar Kaur Sethi d/o Sarwan Sing has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Manvindar Kaur Sethi d/o Sarwan Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Manvindar Kaur Sethi d/o Sarwan Sing has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Manvindar Kaur Sethi d/o Sarwan Sing has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Shook Lin & Bok LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	IMC Transworld Pte Ltd v Ashapura Minechem Ltd: Summary Judgment for Guarantee Payment Obligations(Dec 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Manvindar Kaur Sethi d/o Sarwan Sing's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Manvindar Kaur Sethi d/o Sarwan Sing's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	30,000.00	30,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	IMC Transworld Pte Ltd v Ashapura Minechem Ltd: Summary Judgment for Guarantee Payment Obligations 25 Dec 2023 Ashapura Minechem Limited (Defendant)Lost	25 Dec 2023	Ashapura Minechem Limited (Defendant): Summary Judgment Entered AgainstSummary judgment on the merits be entered against the defendant. Costs were to be in the cause, with such costs awarded to the claimant on an indemnity basis under the terms of the Guarantee. I fixed the costs to the claimant at $30,000, excluding disbursements which would be on a reimbursement basis. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.