Manjit Singh

Manjit Singh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2012. The lawyer has handled 15 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in enforcement of foreign judgments and arbitration. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 7 complex cases, representing 47% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Manjit Singh has demonstrated expertise across 59 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	12 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 12 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	6 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Discovery of documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quantum meruit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Care	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Crossclaims	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Ownership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Taxation of Legal Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shares Sale and Purchase Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Court Judgments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Role of court assessors	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Software Piracy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Search Warrants	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Implied Undertaking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cannabis Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Libel, Slander and Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Manjit Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Manjit Singh has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Manjit & Partners	6 cases	40% of cases	Bajumi Wahab v Afro-Asia Shipping: Review of Taxation Order and Solicitor's Bill of Costs(Aug 2002) Ng Giok Oh v Sajjad Akhtar: Pre-Action Discovery & Court Assessors' Role in Valuation Dispute(Jul 2002) Hong Pian Tee v Les Placements Germain Gauthier Inc: Enforcement of Foreign Judgment & Allegation of Fraud(Mar 2002)
Manjit Govind & Partners	4 cases	27% of cases	Chenet Finance Ltd v Lim Poh Yen: Conspiracy, Share Transfer, and Pre-emption Rights(Aug 2012) Tjong Very Sumito v Antig Investments: Stay of Proceedings Under International Arbitration Act(Nov 2008) Yaku Shin v Panasonic: Quantum Meruit & Contractual Obligations in Supply Chain Dispute(Jun 2008)
Manjit Samuel & Partners	3 cases	20% of cases	SM Summit v Microsoft: Discovery of Documents in Defamation Claim for Software Piracy(May 2001) Business Software Alliance v SM Summit: Discovery, Implied Undertaking & Defamation(Apr 2000) Microsoft v SM Summit: Jurisdiction, Criminal Procedure Code & Implied Undertaking(Mar 2000)
Manjit Govind and Partners	1 cases	7% of cases	Afro-Asia Shipping v Da Zhong Investment: Costs Allocation for Trevi & CKK after Partially Successful Claim(May 2004)
Manjit and Partners	1 cases	7% of cases	Afro-Asia Shipping v Da Zhong: Negligence, Duty of Support & Building Damage(Nov 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Manjit Singh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.1
Complex Cases: 7 (47%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	19.0 parties avg	9.0	7%
Lost	84.1 parties avg	4.1	53%
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	7%
Partial	26.0 parties avg	6.0	13%
Won	35.5 parties avg	5.5	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	29.0 parties avg	9.0
2001	35.5 parties avg	5.5
2002	42.5 parties avg	2.5
2003	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2004	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2008	33.4 parties avg	3.4
2012	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Manjit Singh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(7%)	7%
Lost	8(53%)	53%
Neutral	1(7%)	7%
Partial	2(13%)	13%
Won	3(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	14,000.00	1,272.7311 cases	11

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2001	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2002	4 4	Lost: 4 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2012	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 15 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chenet Finance Ltd v Lim Poh Yen: Conspiracy, Share Transfer, and Pre-emption Rights 02 Aug 2012 Lim Poh Yen (alias Lim Allene) (Defendant)Neutral	02 Aug 2012	Lim Poh Yen (alias Lim Allene) (Defendant): Claim for unlawful act conspiracy dismissedChenet's claim for unlawful act conspiracy against Allene, Abu Bakar, and Berlian was dismissed.
2	Tjong Very Sumito v Antig Investments: Stay of Proceedings Under International Arbitration Act 09 Nov 2008 Herman Aries Tintowo (Respondent, Plaintiff)Lost	09 Nov 2008	Herman Aries Tintowo (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs here and below fixed at $7,000 excluding disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Yaku Shin v Panasonic: Quantum Meruit & Contractual Obligations in Supply Chain Dispute 05 Jun 2008 Yaku Shin (JB) Sdn Bhd (Plaintiff)Lost	05 Jun 2008	Yaku Shin (JB) Sdn Bhd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedMain claim dismissed. Judgment granted for interest on US$13,148.80 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Loh Sze Ti v Gay Choon Ing: Beneficial Ownership of Shares & Breach of Trust 27 Feb 2008 Loh Sze Ti Terence Peter (Plaintiff)Won	27 Feb 2008	Loh Sze Ti Terence Peter (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff. The court declared that Gay held the shares on trust for Loh and rescinded the Points of Agreement. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Afro-Asia Shipping v Da Zhong Investment: Costs Allocation for Trevi & CKK after Partially Successful Claim 20 May 2004 Afro-Asia Shipping Co (Pte) Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	20 May 2004	Afro-Asia Shipping Co (Pte) Ltd (Plaintiff): Partial SuccessThe plaintiffs were successful in a minor portion of their claim against CKK, but were ordered to pay 85% of CKK's costs of defending the claim with respect to liability. The plaintiffs were unsuccessful in their claim against Trevi and were ordered to pay Trevi's costs of defending the claim. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Afro-Asia Shipping v Da Zhong: Negligence, Duty of Support & Building Damage 20 Nov 2003 Afro-Asia Shipping Company (Pte) Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	20 Nov 2003	Afro-Asia Shipping Company (Pte) Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partJudgment for the plaintiff against the first, second, third, and fifth defendants for general damages to be assessed, loss of rental, special damages, and costs. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Bajumi Wahab v Afro-Asia Shipping: Review of Taxation Order and Solicitor's Bill of Costs 13 Aug 2002 Tan family (Defendant)Lost	13 Aug 2002	Tan family (Defendant): Applications for review dismissedApplications for review of the taxation order were dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Ng Giok Oh v Sajjad Akhtar: Pre-Action Discovery & Court Assessors' Role in Valuation Dispute 30 Jul 2002 Ng Giok Oh (Plaintiff)Lost	30 Jul 2002	Ng Giok Oh (Plaintiff): Application dismissedApplication for pre-action discovery was dismissed; costs awarded to the first and third defendants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Hong Pian Tee v Les Placements Germain Gauthier Inc: Enforcement of Foreign Judgment & Allegation of Fraud 27 Mar 2002 Hong Pian Tee (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	27 Mar 2002	Hong Pian Tee (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal dismissedThe appeal against the High Court's decision to grant summary judgment to the plaintiffs was dismissed.
10	Hong Pian Tee v Les Placements Germain Gauthier Inc: Enforcement of Foreign Judgment & Allegation of Fraud 20 Mar 2002 Hong Pian Tee (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	20 Mar 2002	Hong Pian Tee (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedHong Pian Tee's appeal against the enforcement of the Canadian judgment was dismissed.
11	Les Placements Germain Gauthier Inc v Hong Pian Tee: Enforcement of Foreign Judgment & Guarantee 16 Jul 2001 Hong Pian Tee (Defendant)Lost	16 Jul 2001	Hong Pian Tee (Defendant): Appeal DismissedDefendant's appeal against the dismissal of his application to strike out the plaintiff's claim was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment was delivered in Singapore.
12	SM Summit v Microsoft: Discovery of Documents in Defamation Claim for Software Piracy 14 May 2001 Summit CD Manufacture Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	14 May 2001	Summit CD Manufacture Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Appeal against discovery order dismissedPlaintiffs were ordered to file and serve a Further and Better List of Documents. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	S3 Building Services v Sky Technology: Extension of Time for Filing AEICs Dispute 04 May 2001 S3 Building Services Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	04 May 2001	S3 Building Services Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, but S3 Building Services Pte Ltd was awarded costs of the appeal and of two applications below on a standard basis which was fixed at $14,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	Business Software Alliance v SM Summit: Discovery, Implied Undertaking & Defamation 23 Apr 2000 Summit CD Manufacture Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Dismissed	23 Apr 2000	Summit CD Manufacture Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Applications for striking out dismissedApplications for striking out the defendants' applications for discovery were dismissed. (Currency assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore).
15	Microsoft v SM Summit: Jurisdiction, Criminal Procedure Code & Implied Undertaking 08 Mar 2000 Summit CD Manufacture Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	08 Mar 2000	Summit CD Manufacture Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favor of the respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.