Lucy Netto

Lucy Netto is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and child custody. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lucy Netto has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in family law and child custody.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Family Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lucy Netto has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Lucy Netto has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lucy Netto has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Child Support	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Lucy Netto has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Divorce	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Lucy Netto has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Lucy Netto has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lucy Netto has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lucy Netto has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lucy Netto has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Nuncupative Will	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lucy Netto has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lucy Netto has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lucy Netto has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lucy Netto has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lucy Netto has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lucy Netto has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lucy Netto has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lucy Netto has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Netto & Magin LLC	3 cases	60% of cases	ARO v ARP: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance in Divorce Proceedings(Mar 2015) AOF v ACP: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Custody Dispute(May 2014) Liau Cheng Mee James v Liau Ee Ling Julie: Estate Expenses & Will Interpretation(Jul 2013)
Netto & Magin	1 cases	20% of cases	Tan Pwee Eng v Tan Pwee Hwa: Validity of Nuncupative Will under Wills Act(Aug 2010)
Netto Tan & S Magin	1 cases	20% of cases	CYX v CYY: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Maintenance Dispute(Feb 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lucy Netto's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Partial	32.0 parties avg	2.0	60%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lucy Netto's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Partial	3(60%)	60%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	4,784,100.00	1,196,025.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	ARO v ARP: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance in Divorce Proceedings 15 Mar 2015 ARO (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	15 Mar 2015	ARO (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partWife was granted 20% of the matrimonial assets, totaling $4,783,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	AOF v ACP: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Custody Dispute 19 May 2014 ACP (Defendant)Partial	19 May 2014	ACP (Defendant): Division of Matrimonial AssetsThe HDB Property and the Private Property are to be sold within six months of the date of judgment. The net proceeds are to be divided in the ratio of 65:35 in favor of the Plaintiff. Both parties are to refund from their respective shares of the net sale proceeds all CPF monies, together with the accrued interest, to their respective CPF accounts. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Liau Cheng Mee James v Liau Ee Ling Julie: Estate Expenses & Will Interpretation 30 Jul 2013 Liau Ee Ling Julie (Defendant)Lost	30 Jul 2013	Liau Ee Ling Julie (Defendant): Counterclaims largely dismissedCounterclaims dismissed, save for the $600 expense incurred for moving the furniture out of the Deceased’s property. Accordingly, the estate was to reimburse the defendant for this $600 expense. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Tan Pwee Eng v Tan Pwee Hwa: Validity of Nuncupative Will under Wills Act 26 Aug 2010 Tan Pwee Hwa (Respondent)Won	26 Aug 2010	Tan Pwee Hwa (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe appeal against the decision of the district judge was dismissed.
5	CYX v CYY: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Maintenance Dispute 18 Feb 2003 CYY (Respondent)Partial	18 Feb 2003	CYY (Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part regarding the division of matrimonial assets and child maintenance. The court adjusted the asset division to 50/50 and ordered the wife to contribute to child maintenance of $500 per month. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.