Low Wei Ling

Low Wei Ling is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2012. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in judgments and orders and disclosure of documents.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Low Wei Ling has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and evidence law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	22% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Wei Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 22% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Low Wei Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Wei Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Low Wei Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Wei Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Low Wei Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Low Wei Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
E-discovery	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Low Wei Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Low Wei Ling has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 cases	50% of cases	Invenpro v JCS Automation: E-Discovery Dispute over Confidential Information and Batch Scrubber Machines(Dec 2012)
Hee Theng Fong & Co	1 cases	50% of cases	Wee Yue Chew v Su Sh-Hsyu: Setting Aside Judgment Due to Defendant's Absence at Trial(Aug 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Low Wei Ling's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Low Wei Ling's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,000.00	1,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Invenpro v JCS Automation: E-Discovery Dispute over Confidential Information and Batch Scrubber Machines 11 Dec 2012 Invenpro (M) Sdn Bhd (Plaintiff)Lost	11 Dec 2012	Invenpro (M) Sdn Bhd (Plaintiff): Application dismissedPlaintiff's application for e-discovery was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Wee Yue Chew v Su Sh-Hsyu: Setting Aside Judgment Due to Defendant's Absence at Trial 25 Aug 2006 Su Sh-Hsyu (Defendant, Applicant)Lost	25 Aug 2006	Su Sh-Hsyu (Defendant, Applicant): Application dismissed with costsSu's application to set aside the judgment was dismissed with costs fixed at $2000. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.