Low Seow Ling

Low Seow Ling is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in child custody and gifts law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Low Seow Ling has demonstrated expertise across 29 primary practice areas, with significant experience in trusts and estates and family law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Trusts and Estates	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Low Seow Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Low Seow Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Seow Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Low Seow Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Seow Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Low Seow Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Low Seow Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Low Seow Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Seow Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Restraining Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Low Seow Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Low Seow Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Low Seow Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Low Seow Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Low Seow Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Parenting	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Low Seow Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Low Seow Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Low Seow Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Low Seow Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Low Seow Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Low Seow Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Low Seow Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Gifts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Low Seow Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Low Seow Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Interim Maintenance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Low Seow Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Child Abduction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Low Seow Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Hague Convention	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Low Seow Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Low Seow Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Psychology	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Low Seow Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Low Seow Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Low Seow Ling has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Eden Law Corporation	1 cases	50% of cases	BMM v BMN: Resulting Trusts, Gifts, and Proprietary Estoppel in Property Ownership Dispute(May 2017)
Patrick Tan LLC	1 cases	50% of cases	BDU v BDT: Hague Convention, International Child Abduction, Grave Risk of Psychological Harm(Feb 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Low Seow Ling's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Low Seow Ling's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	BMM v BMN: Resulting Trusts, Gifts, and Proprietary Estoppel in Property Ownership Dispute 28 May 2017 BMN (Defendant, Plaintiff)Lost	28 May 2017	BMN (Defendant, Plaintiff): Originating Summons No 574 of 2015 DismissedBMN's claim that she and BMM each hold an equal beneficial interest in the Property, or alternatively a declaration that she holds a beneficial interest in the Property in a proportion calculated based on her various financial contributions is dismissed.
2	BDU v BDT: Hague Convention, International Child Abduction, Grave Risk of Psychological Harm 16 Feb 2014 BDT (Respondent)Won	16 Feb 2014	BDT (Respondent): Application AllowedApplication for the return of the child to Germany allowed, subject to specific undertakings.