Lim Yew Jin

Lim Yew Jin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 8 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sexual offences. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated expertise across 48 primary practice areas, with significant experience in bankruptcy and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Bankruptcy	6 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	4 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Guidelines	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking off defunct companies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Subrogation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equitable Assignment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mental Health Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equitable Set-Off	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Central Provident Fund Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trustee's right of indemnity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Central Provident Fund Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Diplomatic Relations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ascertainment of goods	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Powers	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of director's duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Reasonable diligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abduction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Managing directors	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Juvenile Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Yew Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Yew Jin has been affiliated with 8 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Insolvency & Public Trustee’s Office	4 cases	33% of cases	Maybank Singapore Ltd v Dynamiq Solution Pte Ltd: Winding Up Application and Service of Statutory Demand(Aug 2024) Lim Keng Teck v Official Assignee: Review of Monthly & Target Contribution under IRDA(Oct 2023) Lee Chen Seong Jeremy v Official Assignee: Striking Off Defunct Company with Outstanding Assets(Aug 2018)
Deputy Public Prosecutor	2 cases	17% of cases	Mohammed Walik Shafiq bin Adzhar Sah v Public Prosecutor: Revision of Magistrate Court Sentencing Powers(Aug 2002) Lim Weng Kee v Public Prosecutor: Director's Duty of Diligence & Criminal Breach under Companies Act(Aug 2002)
Official Assignee	1 cases	8% of cases	Lim Lye Hiang v Official Assignee: CPF Nomination, Bankruptcy & Vesting of Assets(Oct 2010)
DPPs	1 cases	8% of cases	Rusli Bin Sembayang v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Cannabis and Retracted Confession(Mar 2003)
IPTO	1 cases	8% of cases	EC Investment v Ridout Residence: Priority of Unsecured Trust Creditors and Trust Beneficiary Claims(Jul 2013)
Attorney-General’s Chambers	1 cases	8% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Siddharth Mujumdar: Sexual Offences Against Minors(Aug 2002)
State Counsel	1 cases	8% of cases	RBG Resources plc v Banque Cantonale Vaudoise: Application for Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel(Oct 2004)
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	8% of cases	PP v Teng Boon Leng: Abduction and Attempted Rape at Bugis Junction(Feb 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Yew Jin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 2 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.3 parties avg	3.3	25%
Neutral	23.5 parties avg	3.5	17%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	8%
Won	62.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Yew Jin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(25%)	25%
Neutral	2(17%)	17%
Partial	1(8%)	8%
Won	6(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	102,614.84	25,653.714 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2003	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Maybank Singapore Ltd v Dynamiq Solution Pte Ltd: Winding Up Application and Service of Statutory Demand 27 Aug 2024 Official Receiver (Non-party)Neutral	27 Aug 2024	Official Receiver (Non-party): NeutralThe Official Receiver was a non-party to the application.
2	Lim Keng Teck v Official Assignee: Review of Monthly & Target Contribution under IRDA 11 Oct 2023 Official Assignee (Respondent)Partial	11 Oct 2023	Official Assignee (Respondent): Determination variedThe Official Assignee's determination of the claimant's monthly contribution and target contribution was varied by the court. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Lee Chen Seong Jeremy v Official Assignee: Striking Off Defunct Company with Outstanding Assets 16 Aug 2018 Official Assignee (Respondent)Lost	16 Aug 2018	Official Assignee (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the court found that Northstar had not abandoned its right of proof against the Appellant’s bankruptcy estate.
4	EC Investment v Ridout Residence: Priority of Unsecured Trust Creditors and Trust Beneficiary Claims 18 Jul 2013 Official Assignee (Respondent)Lost	18 Jul 2013	Official Assignee (Respondent): LostThe claims of ECIH, Thomas Chan and TYF Realty Pte Ltd take precedence over the OA’s claim.
5	Lim Lye Hiang v Official Assignee: Vesting of CPF Monies in Bankruptcy 01 Nov 2011 Official Assignee (Respondent)Won	01 Nov 2011	Official Assignee (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe appeal against the decision to vest the CPF monies in the Official Assignee was dismissed.
6	Lim Lye Hiang v Official Assignee: CPF Nomination, Bankruptcy & Vesting of Assets 10 Oct 2010 Official Assignee (Respondent)Won	10 Oct 2010	Official Assignee (Respondent): Order GrantedOrder granted for the sum of $102,614.84 from the Central Provident Fund to be divisible among the creditors of Lim Lye Hiang. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
7	RBG Resources plc v Banque Cantonale Vaudoise: Application for Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel 28 Oct 2004 Attorney-General (Other)Neutral	28 Oct 2004	Attorney-General (Other): Supported ObjectionSupported the objection to the application for ad hoc admission of Mr. Henry Bernard Eder QC. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Rusli Bin Sembayang v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Cannabis and Retracted Confession 11 Mar 2003 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	11 Mar 2003	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the conviction for trafficking cannabis was dismissed.
9	PP v Teng Boon Leng: Abduction and Attempted Rape at Bugis Junction 13 Feb 2003 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	13 Feb 2003	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for Prosecution
10	Mohammed Walik Shafiq bin Adzhar Sah v Public Prosecutor: Revision of Magistrate Court Sentencing Powers 27 Aug 2002 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	27 Aug 2002	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe appeal against the sentence was dismissed, but the original sentence was set aside due to a jurisdictional error.
11	Lim Weng Kee v Public Prosecutor: Director's Duty of Diligence & Criminal Breach under Companies Act 26 Aug 2002 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	26 Aug 2002	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment UpheldThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld; the appeal was dismissed.
12	Public Prosecutor v Siddharth Mujumdar: Sexual Offences Against Minors 04 Aug 2002 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	04 Aug 2002	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionJudgment for the Prosecution.