Lim Wei Wen

Lim Wei Wen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fiduciary duties and breach of confidence. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Wei Wen has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in chancery and equity and corporate law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Wei Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Wei Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Wei Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Wei Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Wei Wen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Wei Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Wei Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Nominee Director	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Wei Wen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Wei Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Wei Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Wei Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Director's Disqualification	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Wei Wen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Wei Wen has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	1 cases	50% of cases	Bijynath v Innovationz: Director Disqualification Relief Under Companies Act(Sep 2019)
TSMP Law Corporation	1 cases	50% of cases	Centre for Laser v Goh: Breach of Confidence & Conspiracy in Medical Clinic Competition(Apr 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Wei Wen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Wei Wen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Partial	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	193,481.38	193,481.381 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Bijynath v Innovationz: Director Disqualification Relief Under Companies Act 17 Sep 2019 Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority (Intervener)Lost	17 Sep 2019	Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority (Intervener): LostThe intervener's objection to the plaintiff's application was not upheld.
2	Centre for Laser v Goh: Breach of Confidence & Conspiracy in Medical Clinic Competition 05 Apr 2017 Centre for Laser and Aesthetic Medicine Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	05 Apr 2017	Centre for Laser and Aesthetic Medicine Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partJudgment for the Plaintiff on the claim of breach of confidence and conspiracy to injure. Damages agreed upon at $193,481.38 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).