Lim Wee Teck Darren

Lim Wee Teck Darren is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in costs and judgments and orders. Their track record shows a 23.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 8% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated expertise across 48 primary practice areas, with significant experience in commercial disputes and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Commercial Disputes	7 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	7 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	6 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	6 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Costs	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice29% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Examination of judgment debtor	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Valuation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Share Valuation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Shares	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Patient Confidentiality	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Collections	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service of document out of jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disputed Debt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inconsistent positions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Singapore International Commercial Court Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inherent Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Wee Teck Darren has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Wee Teck Darren has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 12 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	12 cases	100% of cases	Kiri Industries v Senda International: Minority Oppression, En Bloc Sale, and Share Valuation(Jan 2025) Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: En Bloc Sale, Priority of Proceeds & Costs(Aug 2024) Kiri Industries v Senda International: Service Out of Jurisdiction & Treaty on Judicial Assistance(May 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Wee Teck Darren's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (8%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	83.1 parties avg	3.1	67%
Partial	23.5 parties avg	3.5	17%
Won	32.3 parties avg	2.3	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2023	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	43.4 parties avg	3.4
2025	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Wee Teck Darren's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	8(62%)	62%
Partial	2(15%)	15%
Won	3(23%)	23%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	8,534,230.71	1,422,371.796 cases	6
USD	1,085,400,000.00	542,700,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2024	5 221	Lost: 2 cases (40.0%) Partial: 2 cases (40.0%) Won: 1 cases (20.0%)
2025	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kiri Industries v Senda International: Minority Oppression, En Bloc Sale, and Share Valuation 30 Jan 2025 Senda International Capital Limited (Respondent, Appellant, Defendant)Lost	30 Jan 2025	Senda International Capital Limited (Respondent, Appellant, Defendant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed, with Senda liable to pay Kiri’s costs fixed at S$60,000.00, and Kiri’s disbursements of S$2,538.60. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: En Bloc Sale, Priority of Proceeds & Costs 28 Aug 2024 Senda International Capital Ltd (Defendant)Lost	28 Aug 2024	Senda International Capital Ltd (Defendant): Unsuccessful in costs applicationSenda to pay Kiri costs in the sum of S$360,050.
3	Kiri Industries v Senda International: Service Out of Jurisdiction & Treaty on Judicial Assistance 27 May 2024 Senda International Capital Ltd (Defendant)Won	27 May 2024	Senda International Capital Ltd (Defendant): Successful in resisting applicationSuccessfully resisted the application to vary the order setting aside the service out order.
4	Kiri Industries v Senda International: Oppression Remedy, En Bloc Share Sale 19 May 2024 Senda International Capital Ltd (Defendant)Partial	19 May 2024	Senda International Capital Ltd (Defendant): Balance of proceeds from en bloc sale after Kiri Industries receives US$603.8mSenda International Capital Ltd will receive the remaining proceeds from the en bloc sale of shares in DyStar after Kiri Industries Ltd receives US$603.8 million.
5	Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Examination Order Dispute 26 Mar 2024 Fan Jing (Other)Lost	26 Mar 2024	Fan Jing (Other): LostThe challenge to the EJD order is not successful; it stands.
6	Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Share Valuation Dispute 02 Mar 2023 Senda International Capital Ltd (Defendant)Lost	02 Mar 2023	Senda International Capital Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantSenda International Capital Ltd was ordered to purchase Kiri Industries Ltd's shares for US$603.8m.
7	Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd: Valuation of Shares in Oppression Case 07 Feb 2023 Senda International Capital Ltd (Defendant)Lost	07 Feb 2023	Senda International Capital Ltd (Defendant): Unfavorable determination of infringing product quantityCourt rejected Senda's expert opinion on the quantity of infringing products.
8	Senda International Capital Ltd v Kiri Industries Ltd: Minority Oppression & Costs Assessment in SICC 24 Nov 2022 Senda International Capital Ltd (Appellant)Lost	24 Nov 2022	Senda International Capital Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedSenda's appeal against the costs judgment was dismissed.
9	Tiong v Chan: Negligence & Wilkinson Rule in Doctor-Patient Relationship 18 Jul 2022 Chan Herng Nieng (Defendant)Won	18 Jul 2022	Chan Herng Nieng (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment was entered in favor of the Defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Kiri Industries v Senda International: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation 07 Dec 2021 Senda International Capital Ltd (Defendant)Lost	07 Dec 2021	Senda International Capital Ltd (Defendant): Costs to be paidSenda International Capital Ltd to pay costs of S$4,960,815.26 and disbursements of S$3,100,826.85 to Kiri Industries Ltd (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd: Valuation of Shares in DyStar 20 Jun 2021 Senda International Capital Ltd (Defendant)Lost	20 Jun 2021	Senda International Capital Ltd (Defendant): Valuation of shares determinedFinal valuation of Kiri's shares adjudged to be US$481.6m, which Senda must pay for the buy-out order.
12	BWG v BWF: Winding Up, Disputed Debt, Arbitration Agreement & Abuse of Process 15 Apr 2020 BWF (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	15 Apr 2020	BWF (Respondent, Plaintiff): Injunction to restrain the appellant from taking out winding-up proceedings grantedInjunction granted with liberty for parties to apply (for eg, to lift the injunction) where there are similar legitimate concerns about the solvency of the debtor-company. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.