Lim Wan Jen Melissa

Lim Wan Jen Melissa is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and bankruptcy. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Wan Jen Melissa has demonstrated expertise across 30 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and bankruptcy.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Wan Jen Melissa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Wan Jen Melissa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Wan Jen Melissa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Wan Jen Melissa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Wan Jen Melissa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Wan Jen Melissa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Wan Jen Melissa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Wan Jen Melissa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Wan Jen Melissa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Wan Jen Melissa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Wan Jen Melissa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Wan Jen Melissa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lim Wan Jen Melissa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Wan Jen Melissa has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Wan Jen Melissa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Wan Jen Melissa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Lim Wan Jen Melissa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Penalties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lim Wan Jen Melissa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Interim Order	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Wan Jen Melissa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lim Wan Jen Melissa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Wan Jen Melissa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lim Wan Jen Melissa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lim Wan Jen Melissa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Wan Jen Melissa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Wan Jen Melissa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Wan Jen Melissa has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Wan Jen Melissa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Wan Jen Melissa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Children's Maintenance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Wan Jen Melissa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Wan Jen Melissa has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Wan Jen Melissa has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	3 cases	100% of cases	CNQ v CNR: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Non-Acceptance of Goods(Oct 2022) VXM v VXN: Appeal on Interim Maintenance for Wife and Children in Divorce Proceedings(Nov 2021) Sifan Triyono v Flame S.A.: Appeal Against Dismissal of Interim Order for Voluntary Arrangement(Mar 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Wan Jen Melissa's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Wan Jen Melissa's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	CNQ v CNR: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Non-Acceptance of Goods 30 Oct 2022 CNR (Respondent)Won	30 Oct 2022	CNR (Respondent): Application dismissedThe respondent successfully defended against the claimant's application to set aside the second arbitration award.
2	VXM v VXN: Appeal on Interim Maintenance for Wife and Children in Divorce Proceedings 09 Nov 2021 VXN (Respondent, Defendant)Partial	09 Nov 2021	VXN (Respondent, Defendant): Partial LossThe Wife's request for a full monthly maintenance order was not granted. However, the Husband was ordered to provide $9,500 for accommodation expenses, to be drawn from the $282,000 that the Wife has access to.
3	Sifan Triyono v Flame S.A.: Appeal Against Dismissal of Interim Order for Voluntary Arrangement 10 Mar 2021 Flame S.A. (Respondent)Won	10 Mar 2021	Flame S.A. (Respondent): WonSuccessfully opposed the appeal and was awarded costs of $17,000 inclusive of disbursements.