Lim Kheng Yan Molly

Lim Kheng Yan Molly is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in divorce and family law.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Kheng Yan Molly has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and divorce.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Lim Kheng Yan Molly has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Kheng Yan Molly has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Kheng Yan Molly has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Kheng Yan Molly has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Kheng Yan Molly has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Kheng Yan Molly has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Kheng Yan Molly has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Kheng Yan Molly has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Kheng Yan Molly has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Kheng Yan Molly has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Kheng Yan Molly has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Knowing Receipt	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Kheng Yan Molly has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Kheng Yan Molly has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Kheng Yan Molly has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Kheng Yan Molly has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Kheng Yan Molly has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Grossly Improper Conduct	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Kheng Yan Molly has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Strata Titles	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Kheng Yan Molly has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Kheng Yan Molly has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Show cause action	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Kheng Yan Molly has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Dishonest assistance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Kheng Yan Molly has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Real Estate Transactions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lim Kheng Yan Molly has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Kheng Yan Molly has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lim Kheng Yan Molly has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Accessory liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Kheng Yan Molly has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appropriate sanction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Kheng Yan Molly has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Kheng Yan Molly has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Collective Sale	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Kheng Yan Molly has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Kheng Yan Molly has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wong Tan & Molly Lim LLC	4 cases	100% of cases	Innovative Corp v Ow Chun Ming: Director's Fiduciary Duties & Corporate Opportunity(May 2019) Law Society v Chia Choon Yang: Disciplinary Proceedings for False Attestation(Jul 2018) Ngui Gek Lian Philomene v Chan Kiat: Collective Sale Dispute over Good Faith and Incentive Payments(Sep 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Kheng Yan Molly's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.6 parties avg	2.6	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Kheng Yan Molly's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Innovative Corp v Ow Chun Ming: Director's Fiduciary Duties & Corporate Opportunity 12 May 2019 Clydesbuilt (Holland Link) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	12 May 2019	Clydesbuilt (Holland Link) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim Allowed in PartClaim allowed in part; an account of profits by the defendants to be determined by the Registrar (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Law Society v Chia Choon Yang: Disciplinary Proceedings for False Attestation 30 Jul 2018 Chia Choon Yang (Respondent)Lost	30 Jul 2018	Chia Choon Yang (Respondent): Suspension from practiceRespondent suspended from practice for a period of 15 months and ordered to bear the costs of the application fixed at $3,000, together with disbursements fixed at $400 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Ngui Gek Lian Philomene v Chan Kiat: Collective Sale Dispute over Good Faith and Incentive Payments 02 Sep 2013 Ngui Gek Lian Philomene (Plaintiff)Lost	02 Sep 2013	Ngui Gek Lian Philomene (Plaintiff): Application dismissedThe application for the collective sale was dismissed.
4	Lian Hwee Choo v Tan Seng Ong: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Agreement in Contemplation of Divorce 02 Jul 2013 Tan Seng Ong (Respondent)Lost	02 Jul 2013	Tan Seng Ong (Respondent): Appeal LostAppeal lost; the court found that there was no agreement for the disposition of assets made in contemplation of divorce within the meaning of s 112(2)(e) of the Charter. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.