Lim Dao Kai

Lim Dao Kai is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 30 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in minority oppression and damages. Their track record shows a 24.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 12 complex cases, representing 40% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated expertise across 84 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	18 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 18 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	15 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 15 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	15 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 15 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	13 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 13 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	10 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	10 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Costs	9 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Share Valuation	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Valuation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shares	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Shares	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs against non-party	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Joint and several liability for costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assessment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mental Health Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Credibility of Witness	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pricing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Directors	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Dispute	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Frontal Lobe Syndrome	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Collections	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Patents	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholder Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Diminished Responsibility	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Discovery of documents	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
De facto director	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Financial Reporting Standards	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inherent Jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Quantum	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Misappropriation of Funds	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mentally disordered offenders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Singapore International Commercial Court Practice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mitigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders’ dispute	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contractual Terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lim Dao Kai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lim Dao Kai has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 27 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	27 cases	90% of cases	Kiri Industries v Senda International: Minority Oppression, En Bloc Sale, and Share Valuation(Jan 2025) Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: En Bloc Sale, Priority of Proceeds & Costs(Aug 2024) Kiri Industries v Senda International: Oppression Remedy, En Bloc Share Sale(May 2024)
Allen & Gledhill	3 cases	10% of cases	Asian Corporate Services v Impact Pacific: Taxation of Costs Dispute After Settlement Agreement(Oct 2008) Mohammad Zam v PP: Appeal Against Life Sentence for Culpable Homicide Due to Mental Disorder(Feb 2007) PP v Mohammad Zam: Culpable Homicide & Sentencing for Frontal Lobe Syndrome(Sep 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Dao Kai's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.8
Complex Cases: 12 (40%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	125.8 parties avg	5.8	40%
Neutral	46.0 parties avg	6.0	13%
Partial	103.2 parties avg	3.2	33%
Won	83.9 parties avg	3.9	27%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	36.3 parties avg	6.3
2010	43.8 parties avg	3.8
2012	27.0 parties avg	7.0
2013	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2017	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2019	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2020	65.6 parties avg	5.6
2021	43.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2025	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Dao Kai's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	12(35%)	35%
Neutral	4(12%)	12%
Partial	10(29%)	29%
Won	8(24%)	24%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	13,006,529.51	1,182,411.7711 cases	11
USD	1,690,556,961.00	422,639,240.254 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2010	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2012	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	10 3331	Lost: 3 cases (30.0%) Neutral: 3 cases (30.0%) Partial: 3 cases (30.0%) Won: 1 cases (10.0%)
2021	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)
2025	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 30 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kiri Industries v Senda International: Minority Oppression, En Bloc Sale, and Share Valuation 30 Jan 2025 Kiri Industries Limited (Appellant, Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	30 Jan 2025	Kiri Industries Limited (Appellant, Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part, with Senda liable to reimburse Kiri’s costs fixed at S$90,000.00, and Kiri’s disbursements of S$4,837.40. Discretionary enhancement of the sum to be paid to Kiri following the en bloc sale, calculated at 5.33% per annum on US$603.8m running from 3 September 2023 until the date of payment. That sum, as with the Valuation figure, will be paid to Kiri in priority as against Senda out of the net proceeds of the en bloc sale. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: En Bloc Sale, Priority of Proceeds & Costs 28 Aug 2024 Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	28 Aug 2024	Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff): Partial success in costs applicationSenda to pay costs in the sum of S$360,050.
3	Kiri Industries v Senda International: Oppression Remedy, En Bloc Share Sale 19 May 2024 Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	19 May 2024	Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff): Entitled to US$603.8m in priority from en bloc sale proceedsKiri Industries will receive US$603.8 million from the proceeds of the en bloc sale of shares in DyStar, in priority to Senda International Capital Ltd.
4	Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Share Valuation Dispute 02 Mar 2023 Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	02 Mar 2023	Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffFinal valuation of Kiri’s shares adjudged to be US$603.8m for the buy-out order.
5	Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd: Valuation of Shares in Oppression Case 07 Feb 2023 Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	07 Feb 2023	Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff): Favorable determination of infringing product quantityCourt determined the annual tonnage of related products produced by Longsheng to be 56,750 tonnes, with 53,550 tonnes used for notional license fee calculation.
6	Kiri Industries v Senda International: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation Appeal 05 Jul 2022 Kiri Industries Ltd (Appellant, Applicant, Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	05 Jul 2022	Kiri Industries Ltd (Appellant, Applicant, Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part regarding DLOM and notional license fee. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd: Costs Against Non-Party 26 Dec 2021 Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	26 Dec 2021	Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff): Application deniedKiri's application to make Longsheng jointly and severally liable for Senda's costs was denied. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Kiri Industries v Senda International: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation 07 Dec 2021 Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	07 Dec 2021	Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff): Costs awardedCosts of S$4,960,815.26 and disbursements of S$3,100,826.85 awarded to Kiri Industries Ltd (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd: Valuation of Shares in DyStar 20 Jun 2021 Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	20 Jun 2021	Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff): Valuation of shares determinedFinal valuation of Kiri's shares adjudged to be US$481.6m.
10	Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Share Valuation & Oppression 02 Jun 2021 Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff)Neutral	02 Jun 2021	Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff): Shares to be valuedShares in DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd to be valued (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Share Valuation 20 Dec 2020 Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	20 Dec 2020	Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff): Shares to be purchased by DefendantSenda International Capital Ltd was ordered to purchase Kiri Industries Ltd’s shares in DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd. The final amount is to be determined based on the adjustments outlined in the judgment. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Kiri Industries v DyStar Global Holdings: Damages Assessment for Breach of Non-Compete 18 Oct 2020 Manishkumar Pravinchandra Kiri (Appellant)Partial	18 Oct 2020	Manishkumar Pravinchandra Kiri (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part; damages calculation adjusted in favor of Manishkumar Pravinchandra Kiri. Kiri to obtain 50% of the costs of its appeal. No change to the assessment of DyStar's costs below. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
13	Trinity Construction v Sinohydro: Striking Out & Stay of Proceedings in Arbitration Dispute 06 Oct 2020 Trinity Construction Development Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	06 Oct 2020	Trinity Construction Development Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Striking out application dismissed, Suit stayedThe striking out application was dismissed, but the suit was stayed pending resolution of the arbitration between the parties.
14	DyStar Global Holdings v. Kiri Industries: Assessment of Damages and Costs for Breach of Contract 02 Mar 2020 Mukherjee Amitava (Defendant)Neutral	02 Mar 2020	Mukherjee Amitava (Defendant): NeutralNo specific orders made against this defendant in this judgment.
15	Senda International Capital v Kiri Industries: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation 11 Feb 2020 Mukherjee Amitava (Respondent, Defendant in Counterclaim)Neutral	11 Feb 2020	Mukherjee Amitava (Respondent, Defendant in Counterclaim): NeutralNo specific outcome mentioned for this party.
16	DyStar v Kiri: Damages Assessment for Breach of Non-Compete in Dye Industry 08 Jan 2020 Mukherjee Amitava (Defendant)Neutral	08 Jan 2020	Mukherjee Amitava (Defendant): NeutralNo specific outcome mentioned for this party in the provided text.
17	Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation 11 Mar 2019 Kiri Industries Limited (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Won	11 Mar 2019	Kiri Industries Limited (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Claim AllowedKiri was entitled to full costs on its claim in Suit 4. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
18	Mukherjee v DyStar: Director's Right to Inspect Company Records under Section 199 of the Companies Act 18 Dec 2017 Mukherjee Amitava (Plaintiff)Lost	18 Dec 2017	Mukherjee Amitava (Plaintiff): Application dismissedApplication to inspect company records was dismissed with costs. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
19	Visionhealthone v HD Holdings: Conspiracy, Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Joint Venture Dispute 01 Sep 2013 Visionhealthone Corp Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent)Partial	01 Sep 2013	Visionhealthone Corp Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in respect of the tort of unlawful act conspiracy on the part of HPPL and LCL. Damages representing S$2.125m to be paid jointly by HPPL and LCL. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
20	Raffles Town Club v Lim Eng Hock Peter: Breach of Directors' Duties & Conspiracy 30 Oct 2012 Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	30 Oct 2012	Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedRTC's appeal against the dismissal of its claims against the former directors was dismissed.
21	VisionHealthOne v HD Holdings: Conspiracy, Fraudulent Misrepresentation Claim 23 Jul 2012 Visionhealthone Corp Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	23 Jul 2012	Visionhealthone Corp Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for $2.125m was dismissed due to insufficient evidence. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	JBE Properties v Gammon: Interim Injunction Against Performance Bond Call Due to Unconscionability 02 Dec 2010 Gammon Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	02 Dec 2010	Gammon Pte Ltd (Respondent): Interim Injunction upheldThe interim injunction restraining JBE from receiving payment under the Bond was upheld.
23	Raffles Town Club v Lim Eng Hock Peter: Costs Allocation for Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claim 29 Sep 2010 Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Sep 2010	Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claims DismissedRTC's claims against the Defendants were dismissed in their entirety. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
24	Xing Rong Pte Ltd v Visionhealthone: Appeal on Discovery Order for Joint Venture Funds 25 Aug 2010 Visionhealthone Corporation Pte Ltd (Respondent)Partial	25 Aug 2010	Visionhealthone Corporation Pte Ltd (Respondent): Partial WinSuccessfully defended the Discovery Order, but lost the striking out application appeal.
25	Gammon v JBE Properties: Injunction Against Performance Bond Call Due to Unconscionability 27 Apr 2010 Gammon Pte Limited (Plaintiff)Won	27 Apr 2010	Gammon Pte Limited (Plaintiff): Injunction GrantedInjunction granted to restrain the defendant from receiving payment from BNP Paribas Singapore on a performance bond until further order.
26	Asian Corporate Services v Impact Pacific: Taxation of Costs Dispute After Settlement Agreement 20 Oct 2008 Gregory James Kennedy (Defendant)Lost	20 Oct 2008	Gregory James Kennedy (Defendant): Costs to be paidCosts of the claim and counterclaim in Suit 834/2004 to be taxed and paid forthwith. Costs of the originating summons fixed at $5,000 to be paid by the first to eighth defendants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
27	Raffles Town Club v Lim Eng Hock: Discovery of Documents & Directors' Duties 25 Aug 2008 Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	25 Aug 2008	Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedAppeal against order for discovery of documents was dismissed.
28	VisionHealthOne Corp v Vision Corp: Debt Recovery & Director's Fiduciary Duty 12 Aug 2008 Visionhealthone Corp Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	12 Aug 2008	Visionhealthone Corp Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment entered against the defendant in the sum of $190,000 together with interest. Conditional leave to defend in respect of the sum of $73,000 was given. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
29	Mohammad Zam v PP: Appeal Against Life Sentence for Culpable Homicide Due to Mental Disorder 22 Feb 2007 Mohammad Zam bin Abdul Rashid (Appellant)Lost	22 Feb 2007	Mohammad Zam bin Abdul Rashid (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against his life sentence was dismissed.
30	PP v Mohammad Zam: Culpable Homicide & Sentencing for Frontal Lobe Syndrome 20 Sep 2006 Mohammad Zam bin Abdul Rashid (Defendant)Lost	20 Sep 2006	Mohammad Zam bin Abdul Rashid (Defendant): ConvictedThe accused was sentenced to life imprisonment for culpable homicide.