Li Weiming Mark

Li Weiming Mark is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in income taxation and misappropriation of funds.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Li Weiming Mark has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in corporate law and white collar crime.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Corporate Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Li Weiming Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
White Collar Crime	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Li Weiming Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Li Weiming Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Li Weiming Mark has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Income taxation	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Li Weiming Mark has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Li Weiming Mark has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Li Weiming Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Misappropriation of Funds	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Li Weiming Mark has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Criminal Breach of Trust	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Li Weiming Mark has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Tax Deductions	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Li Weiming Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Li Weiming Mark has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	AQP v Comptroller of Income Tax: Income Tax Deduction for Misappropriated Funds(Jan 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Li Weiming Mark's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Li Weiming Mark's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	AQP v Comptroller of Income Tax: Income Tax Deduction for Misappropriated Funds 15 Jan 2013 AQP (Appellant)Partial	15 Jan 2013	AQP (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; case remitted to the Income Tax Board of Review for further evidence.