Leong Woon Ho

Leong Woon Ho is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in bankruptcy and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Leong Woon Ho has demonstrated expertise across 31 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and costs.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	4 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Leong Woon Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Costs	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Leong Woon Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Leong Woon Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Leong Woon Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Leong Woon Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Leong Woon Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Leong Woon Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Leong Woon Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Documentary Credits	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Leong Woon Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Leong Woon Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Leong Woon Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Leong Woon Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Leong Woon Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Leong Woon Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Leong Woon Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Leong Woon Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Letter of Credit Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Leong Woon Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Leong Woon Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leong Woon Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Leong Woon Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Leong Woon Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Leong Woon Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Leong Woon Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Leong Woon Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leong Woon Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Trade Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Leong Woon Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Leong Woon Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Joint and Several Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Leong Woon Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Leong Woon Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Leong Woon Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Leong Woon Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Leong Woon Ho has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Shook Lin & Bok LLP	5 cases	100% of cases	Winson Oil v OCBC & SCB: Letter of Credit Fraud Exception & Forged Bills of Lading(Aug 2023) CBB v Law Society: Mandatory Order for Legal Profession Act Complaint(Jan 2021) Koh Kim Teck v Shook Lin & Bok LLP: Setting Aside Statutory Demand & Validity of Service(Dec 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Leong Woon Ho's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	32.3 parties avg	2.3	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Leong Woon Ho's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	38,000.00	9,500.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2021	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Winson Oil v OCBC & SCB: Letter of Credit Fraud Exception & Forged Bills of Lading 17 Aug 2023 Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) Limited (Defendant)Won	17 Aug 2023	Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) Limited (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) Limited as the Fraud Exception was established.
2	CBB v Law Society: Mandatory Order for Legal Profession Act Complaint 28 Jan 2021 CBB (Appellant, Applicant)Partial	28 Jan 2021	CBB (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; mandatory order granted. Costs of the appeal awarded to the appellant, fixed at $10,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Koh Kim Teck v Shook Lin & Bok LLP: Setting Aside Statutory Demand & Validity of Service 09 Dec 2020 Shook Lin & Bok LLP (Respondent)Won	09 Dec 2020	Shook Lin & Bok LLP (Respondent): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld; costs of $24,000 (including disbursements) to be paid by the appellant to the respondent. The usual consequential orders are to apply. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Koh Kim Teck v. Shook Lin & Bok LLP: Bankruptcy - Setting Aside Statutory Demand 28 Apr 2020 Shook Lin & Bok LLP (Defendant, Respondent)Won	28 Apr 2020	Shook Lin & Bok LLP (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $4,000 to be paid by the plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	CBB v Law Society of Singapore: Costs Order in Judicial Review of Regulatory Function 18 Mar 2020 CBB (Applicant)Lost	18 Mar 2020	CBB (Applicant): Costs not awardedThe Applicant's request for costs was denied.