Lam Yan-Ting Tyne

Lam Yan-Ting Tyne is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in recourse against award and setting aside. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lam Yan-Ting Tyne has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and shareholders agreement.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Lam Yan-Ting Tyne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	3 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Lam Yan-Ting Tyne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lam Yan-Ting Tyne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lam Yan-Ting Tyne has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Lam Yan-Ting Tyne has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lam Yan-Ting Tyne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lam Yan-Ting Tyne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lam Yan-Ting Tyne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lam Yan-Ting Tyne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lam Yan-Ting Tyne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Lam Yan-Ting Tyne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lam Yan-Ting Tyne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Loan Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Lam Yan-Ting Tyne has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Best effort obligations	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lam Yan-Ting Tyne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Obligations imposed	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lam Yan-Ting Tyne has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Undertaking	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lam Yan-Ting Tyne has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Lam Yan-Ting Tyne has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lam Yan-Ting Tyne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lam Yan-Ting Tyne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Lam Yan-Ting Tyne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lam Yan-Ting Tyne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lam Yan-Ting Tyne has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ascendant Legal LLC	3 cases	100% of cases	Carlsberg v CSAPL: Breach of Contract & Best Effort Obligations in Loan Repayment Dispute(Jan 2022) BTN v BTP: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Earn Out Consideration Dispute(Nov 2021) Carlsberg v CSAPL: Breach of Contract & Best Efforts in Director Attendance(Mar 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lam Yan-Ting Tyne's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.0
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	28.7 parties avg	8.7	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	28.7 parties avg	8.7
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lam Yan-Ting Tyne's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1
USD	42,950,829.71	42,950,829.711 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Carlsberg v CSAPL: Breach of Contract & Best Effort Obligations in Loan Repayment Dispute 09 Jan 2022 Carlsberg Breweries A/S (Appellant, Plaintiff)Won	09 Jan 2022	Carlsberg Breweries A/S (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; all outstanding amounts under the Loan Agreement are due and payable.
2	BTN v BTP: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Earn Out Consideration Dispute 29 Nov 2021 BTQ (Defendant)Won	29 Nov 2021	BTQ (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court upheld the arbitration award in favor of the defendant.
3	Carlsberg v CSAPL: Breach of Contract & Best Efforts in Director Attendance 11 Mar 2021 Carlsberg Breweries A/S (Plaintiff)Lost	11 Mar 2021	Carlsberg Breweries A/S (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedCarlsberg's claim for repayment of the outstanding loan was dismissed as the court found that CSAPLH did not breach clause 2(c) of the Deed of Undertaking.