Kirpal Singh

Kirpal Singh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 16 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in copyrights and criminal procedure. Their track record shows a 6.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 8 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kirpal Singh has demonstrated expertise across 59 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	7 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	6 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Voluntary Arrangement	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interim Order	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inherent Power of the Court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Worker Rights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment of Foreign Manpower Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forfeiture	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Copyright Infringement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Parallel Import	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Patent Amendments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Search Warrant	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ultra vires	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Procedural Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joinder of Parties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trustees	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kirpal Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kirpal Singh has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Kirpal & Associates	8 cases	50% of cases	Syed Ahmad Jamal Alsagoff v Harun bin Syed Hussain Aljunied: Intervention in Trust Will Dispute(Apr 2017) Alsagoff v Aljunied: Leasehold Interests, Fraud, Conspiracy & Intermeddling(Nov 2016) Lee Chiang Theng v PP: Employer's Duty to Foreign Workers' Welfare & Timely Salary Payment(Nov 2011)
Kirpal and Associates	5 cases	31% of cases	New Line Productions v Aglow Video: Copyright Infringement, Corporate Veil Piercing(Jul 2005) Cigar Affair v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Reference, Search Warrants & Trade Marks Act(Jun 2005) Cigar Affair v Pacific Cigar Company: Trade Mark Offences & Search Warrants(Jun 2005)
Kirpal Singh & Co	2 cases	13% of cases	Re Voluntary Arrangement by Lek Kee Meng: Creditors' Rights in Bankruptcy Interim Order Application(Jul 2001) Lek Kee Meng: Application for Interim Order under Bankruptcy Act(Jul 2001)
—	1 cases	6% of cases	Lek Kee Meng Voluntary Arrangement: Interim Order Application Under Bankruptcy Act(Jul 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kirpal Singh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.3
Complex Cases: 8 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	112.0 parties avg	12.0	6%
Lost	123.8 parties avg	3.8	75%
Neutral	17.0 parties avg	7.0	6%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	6%
Won	112.0 parties avg	12.0	6%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	63.9 parties avg	3.9
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	44.0 parties avg	4.0
2010	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	112.0 parties avg	12.0
2017	112.0 parties avg	12.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kirpal Singh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(6%)	6%
Lost	12(75%)	75%
Neutral	1(6%)	6%
Partial	1(6%)	6%
Won	1(6%)	6%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,950,767.94	243,845.998 cases	8

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	6 6	Lost: 6 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	4 4	Lost: 4 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 16 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Syed Ahmad Jamal Alsagoff v Harun bin Syed Hussain Aljunied: Intervention in Trust Will Dispute 16 Apr 2017 Syed Abdulkader Bin Syed Ali @ Syed Abdul Kader Alhadad (Respondent)Won	16 Apr 2017	Syed Abdulkader Bin Syed Ali @ Syed Abdul Kader Alhadad (Respondent): Costs AwardedCosts of $12,000 awarded to the first and second respondents (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Alsagoff v Aljunied: Leasehold Interests, Fraud, Conspiracy & Intermeddling 08 Nov 2016 Syed Abdulkader Bin Syed Ali @ Syed Abdul Kader Alhadad (Defendant)Dismissed	08 Nov 2016	Syed Abdulkader Bin Syed Ali @ Syed Abdul Kader Alhadad (Defendant): Claim dismissedPlaintiffs' claims in fraud, conspiracy and intermeddling were dismissed.
3	Lee Chiang Theng v PP: Employer's Duty to Foreign Workers' Welfare & Timely Salary Payment 21 Nov 2011 Lee Chiang Theng (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	21 Nov 2011	Lee Chiang Theng (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal against sentence for salary charges dismissed.
4	Alsagoff v Aljunied: Striking Out Action Over Upper Dickson Road Properties 25 Nov 2010 Harun Bin Syed Hussain Aljunied (alias Harun Aljunied) and others (Defendant)Lost	25 Nov 2010	Harun Bin Syed Hussain Aljunied (alias Harun Aljunied) and others (Defendant): Application to strike out dismissedApplication to strike out the action was dismissed with costs fixed at $20,000 plus reasonable disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Swiss Butchery Pte Ltd v Huber Ernst: Breach of Director's Duties and Conspiracy 26 Apr 2010 Thomas Norbert Kreissl (Defendant)Neutral	26 Apr 2010	Thomas Norbert Kreissl (Defendant): No order on the claimNo order on the claim against Thomas Norbert Kreissl.
6	New Line Productions v Aglow Video: Copyright Infringement, Corporate Veil Piercing 05 Jul 2005 TS Laser Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	05 Jul 2005	TS Laser Pte Ltd (Defendant): Found liableFound liable for copyright infringement and ordered to pay damages and additional damages (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Cigar Affair v Pacific Cigar Company: Trade Mark Offences & Search Warrants 30 Jun 2005 Cigar Affair (Applicant)Lost	30 Jun 2005	Cigar Affair (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication to set aside search warrants was dismissed with costs.
8	Cigar Affair v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Reference, Search Warrants & Trade Marks Act 30 Jun 2005 Cigar Affair (Applicant)Lost	30 Jun 2005	Cigar Affair (Applicant): Application dismissedCigar Affair's application for questions of law to be reserved for the Court of Appeal was dismissed.
9	Megastar Entertainment v Odex: Copyright Act Search Warrants & Digital Evidence 27 Apr 2005 TS Digital Laser Pte Ltd (Petitioner)Lost	27 Apr 2005	TS Digital Laser Pte Ltd (Petitioner): Petition dismissedPetition for criminal revision dismissed; costs of the criminal revision awarded to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Public Prosecutor v. Poh Kim Video: Copyright Infringement under Copyright Act 02 Dec 2003 Poh Kim Video Pte Ltd (Respondent)Partial	02 Dec 2003	Poh Kim Video Pte Ltd (Respondent): Fine of $10,000 UpheldThe court upheld the magistrate's decision to fine Poh Kim Video $2,000 per charge, totaling $10,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	TS Video v Lim Chee Yong: Copyright Infringement, Discharge Not Amounting to Acquittal 18 Nov 2001 TS Entertainment Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	18 Nov 2001	TS Entertainment Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the trial judge's decision to grant a discharge not amounting to an acquittal was dismissed.
12	Wang Cong Qin Bobby v Ong Heng Huat: Dispute over Interest Payments for Loan Secured by Company Properties 29 Jul 2001 Ong Heng Huat (Defendant)Lost	29 Jul 2001	Ong Heng Huat (Defendant): Claim DismissedJudgment against the defendant for $1,596,947.94 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
13	Wang CongQin Bobby v Ong Heng Huat: Enforceability of Contract & Use of Company Assets as Collateral 29 Jul 2001 Ong Heng Huat (Defendant)Lost	29 Jul 2001	Ong Heng Huat (Defendant): Claim DismissedJudgment against the defendant; claim dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	Lek Kee Meng Voluntary Arrangement: Interim Order Application Under Bankruptcy Act 16 Jul 2001 Lek Kee Meng (Applicant, Appellant)Lost	16 Jul 2001	Lek Kee Meng (Applicant, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; the court held that it was entitled to direct that the application be served on any interested party and that party be at liberty to address the court as part of the terms of the order. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Re Voluntary Arrangement by Lek Kee Meng: Creditors' Rights in Bankruptcy Interim Order Application 12 Jul 2001 Lek Kee Meng (Appellant, Applicant)Lost	12 Jul 2001	Lek Kee Meng (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed.
16	Lek Kee Meng: Application for Interim Order under Bankruptcy Act 12 Jul 2001 Lek Kee Meng (Appellant, Applicant)Lost	12 Jul 2001	Lek Kee Meng (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed, allowing creditors to be heard in the application for an interim order.